Comments on: EXXON SHIPPING CO. v. BAKER: Supreme Court did not apply a constitutional standard in Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker

By: BIG OIL: Exxon Mobil $11.68 billion 2Q profit sets US record « The Conservation Report

Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:06:05 +0000

[...] by buckdenton on July 31st, 2008 And to think Exxon didn’t even want to pay any damages in Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker. I wonder how Exxon Mobil will spend their $11.68 billion 2Q profits. Will the oil giant use its [...]

By: lauri

lauri — Sat, 12 Jul 2008 20:25:01 +0000

What a great photo! Is this available for purchase somewhere?

By: FISHERIES: Supreme Court of Canada says British Columbia’s aboriginal-only fishery constitutional « The Conservation Report

Tue, 01 Jul 2008 14:53:12 +0000

[...] The Supreme Court of the United States was not the only Supreme Court to recently rule on some interesting cases. Before taking summer recess the Supreme Court of Canada decided the constitutionality of a [...]

By: Pages tagged "punitive"

Pages tagged "punitive" — Sun, 29 Jun 2008 08:42:58 +0000

[...] bookmarks tagged punitive EXXON SHIPPING CO. V. BAKER: Supreme Court did not… saved by 5 others mehrwish bookmarked on 06/29/08 | [...]

By: EXXON SHIPPING CO. v. BAKER decision today? « The Conservation Report

EXXON SHIPPING CO. v. BAKER decision today? « The Conservation Report — Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:44:23 +0000

[...] the Net (UPDATE): EXXON SHIPPING CO. v. BAKER: Supreme Court did not apply a constitutional standard in Exxon Shipping… Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Conservatives aim tomake planning decisions more [...]

By: Exxon crude oil $US45.45: US Supreme Court ruling « typing is not activism….

Thu, 26 Jun 2008 06:58:11 +0000

[...] found that Exxon should only have to pay $500 million in punitive damages, seeing as the company had already paid $507 million in damages to directly compensate communities [...]