The Conservation Report

In wildness is the preservation of the world. – Henry David Thoreau

WTF?: Pigeon for dinner?

with one comment

Rats with wings is how many of us perceive pigeons. However, I agree with Alexis Madrigal that a pigeon can serve a greater utility on our dinner plates, and the birds are more accurately described as “waste-scavenging, protein-generating biomachine[s].” Pigeon is some good eating and I like the reasoning that:

Really, all pigeons need is a re-branding. Just as the spurned Patagonian toothfish became the majestic Chilean sea bass and the silly Chinese gooseberry became the beloved kiwifruit, pigeons can merely reclaim their previous sufficiently arugula-sounding name: squab.

The term squab now refers to the meat of the baby pigeon, but it can also mean pigeons in general, so we can simply extend the brand back to its historical proportions. In fact, some companies like Bokhari Squab Farms are already doing good business selling the stuff: A dozen of Bokhari’s live squab goes for $60.

Imagine this:

can turn into this:


Photo source for attribution here and here. The authors or licensors of these images do not endorse my work or me and their images are protected under an attribution license.

Written by Buck Denton

July 23, 2008 at 2:03 am

Posted in Uncategorized

Tagged with ,

One Response to 'WTF?: Pigeon for dinner?'

Subscribe to comments with RSS or TrackBack to 'WTF?: Pigeon for dinner?'.

  1. [...] in Uncategorized by buckdenton on July 23rd, 2008 Apparently, another reason why we should be eating pigeons is, because they are already eating [...]

Leave a Reply