Home > Uncategorized > NUCLEARIZATION OF ENERGY SOURCES: Thorium-based nuclear energy promsing what uranium never delivered?

NUCLEARIZATION OF ENERGY SOURCES: Thorium-based nuclear energy promsing what uranium never delivered?

The new age of nuclear power? What if there was a nuclear reactor with “no possibility of a meltdown,” that “generated its power inexpensively, created no weapons-grade by-products, and burnt up existing high-level waste as well as old nuclear weapon stockpiles,” and “what if the waste produced by such a reactor was radioactive for a mere few hundred years rather than tens of thousands?” Proponents of a new generation of nuclear reactors that are powered by thorium claim these thorium-based nuclear reactors can deliver what uranium-based reactors never could.

  1. Ken
    August 11, 2008 at 2:51 pm | #1

    There are several ways to utilize Thorium, which also has potential economic advantages on the front end (more abundant than uranium and no expensive enrichment required). It has already been used in pebble bed reactors both here and in Germany for commercial power production. There is a company, Thorium Power Ltd which is close to marketing a fuel design that not only converts current light water reactors into Thorium burners, but also enables these same reactors to dispose of long term nuclear waste products from other reactors. Another option actively under development in Japan is the liquid fluoride thorium reactor, which they call Fuji II. This one promises to be the most efficient reactor ever built since it can almost completely burn down the input thorium fuel. It can also be used as a nuclear waste ‘garbage disposal’ for all the long lived transuranic waste from current reactors. Bye bye Yuka Mtn!

    Tell McCain and Obama to support research into the utilization of Thorium and write you congress people too. Don’t make this a narrow partisan issue, it is far too important, I’m as blue as they get and I fully support nuclear power. Coal is killing the planet, it’s not the CO2 (which is bad), it is the heavy metals. A single coal plant will dump 30,000 pounds of highly toxic mercury into the sky to fall back into the oceans. Just picture that much mercury in five gallon pails. Probably several hundred of the heavy stuff. Then pick up the pails one at a time and dump them into the nearest river upstream of your water source. Get the picture? Repeat for each of the hundreds of coal fired plants across the country. Repeat for Arsenic, Chromium, Uranium and Thorium. Mercury stays around in the environment for hundreds of years so repeat year after year. Ever wonder where all the mercury in tuna comes from? Oh, did I mention acid rain?

  1. August 11, 2008 at 3:20 pm | #1