<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WTF?: Blacktip shark pulled from Lake Michigan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conservationreport.com/2008/09/02/wtf-blacktip-shark-pulled-from-lake-michigan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conservationreport.com/2008/09/02/wtf-blacktip-shark-pulled-from-lake-michigan/</link>
	<description>Tracking news regarding conservation, the environment, energy, politics, and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:31:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buck Denton</title>
		<link>http://conservationreport.com/2008/09/02/wtf-blacktip-shark-pulled-from-lake-michigan/#comment-1110</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Buck Denton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservationreport.wordpress.com/?p=1795#comment-1110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The press reported that George Burgess, director of the Florida Program For Shark Research at the University of Florida, identified the shark as appearing to be a &quot;juvenile blacktip shark.&quot;  The images aren&#039;t the best for fish identification, and juvenile markings can change over time.  Furthermore, common names can be just as confusing, since they are interchangeable.  I will change Carcharhinus limbatus to Carcharhinus sp.  Thanks!

Source: http://www.record-eagle.com/local/local_story_243093811.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The press reported that George Burgess, director of the Florida Program For Shark Research at the University of Florida, identified the shark as appearing to be a &#8220;juvenile blacktip shark.&#8221;  The images aren&#8217;t the best for fish identification, and juvenile markings can change over time.  Furthermore, common names can be just as confusing, since they are interchangeable.  I will change Carcharhinus limbatus to Carcharhinus sp.  Thanks!</p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.record-eagle.com/local/local_story_243093811.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.record-eagle.com/local/local_story_243093811.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cheesesoda</title>
		<link>http://conservationreport.com/2008/09/02/wtf-blacktip-shark-pulled-from-lake-michigan/#comment-1109</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cheesesoda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 00:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservationreport.wordpress.com/?p=1795#comment-1109</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you sure you mean Carcharhinus limbatus and not Carcharhinus melanopterus, a blacktip REEF shark?

Neither are freshwater fish, but I think chances are it&#039;s a blacktip reef shark because of its size.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you sure you mean Carcharhinus limbatus and not Carcharhinus melanopterus, a blacktip REEF shark?</p>
<p>Neither are freshwater fish, but I think chances are it&#8217;s a blacktip reef shark because of its size.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

