<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: POLITICS: The looniness of Michele Bachmann</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conservationreport.com/2008/10/24/politics-the-looniness-of-michele-bachmann/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conservationreport.com/2008/10/24/politics-the-looniness-of-michele-bachmann/</link>
	<description>In wildness is the preservation of the world. – Henry David Thoreau</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 20:20:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Buck Denton</title>
		<link>http://conservationreport.com/2008/10/24/politics-the-looniness-of-michele-bachmann/#comment-997</link>
		<dc:creator>Buck Denton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:58:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservationreport.wordpress.com/?p=3354#comment-997</guid>
		<description>Chris Matthews questioned Michele Bachmann and she hung herself.  

We need to find alternatives now, not later.

[the U.S. cannot function on wind and solar alone (this will never be a possibility)]  - a very broad statement, but solar and wind can supply a lot of energy to the Untied States.  The potential is huge, and while we use solar and wind we can save our fossil fuels.

Your assessment on ANWR is wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Matthews questioned Michele Bachmann and she hung herself.  </p>
<p>We need to find alternatives now, not later.</p>
<p>[the U.S. cannot function on wind and solar alone (this will never be a possibility)]  &#8211; a very broad statement, but solar and wind can supply a lot of energy to the Untied States.  The potential is huge, and while we use solar and wind we can save our fossil fuels.</p>
<p>Your assessment on ANWR is wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CK</title>
		<link>http://conservationreport.com/2008/10/24/politics-the-looniness-of-michele-bachmann/#comment-995</link>
		<dc:creator>CK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservationreport.wordpress.com/?p=3354#comment-995</guid>
		<description>Chris Matthews will probably soon need to find another line of work - he has drafted the fumes of buddy Keith Obermann into a free fall off the cliff of journalistic integrity (a leap he made with glee). As for energy policy, all U.S. energy is good U.S. energy - oil and the like will bridge the gap until a time when we are better able to efficiently offset fossil fuels for alternative fuels - the U.S. cannot function on wind and solar alone (this will never be a possibility). If you believe the pictures you are provided by the MSM of ANWR, you liken it to a pristine and fragile ecosystem of beautiful fauna and flora - it ain&#039;t. It is a barren area of 2000 acres within a 19.5 million acre tract (it&#039;s the size of a big airport). But, if the democrats win the election, there&#039;s not likely to be much drilling of any sort - to that point, Joe Biden was 1 of 4 senators in 1973 to vote against the Alaskan pipeline (wow).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris Matthews will probably soon need to find another line of work &#8211; he has drafted the fumes of buddy Keith Obermann into a free fall off the cliff of journalistic integrity (a leap he made with glee). As for energy policy, all U.S. energy is good U.S. energy &#8211; oil and the like will bridge the gap until a time when we are better able to efficiently offset fossil fuels for alternative fuels &#8211; the U.S. cannot function on wind and solar alone (this will never be a possibility). If you believe the pictures you are provided by the MSM of ANWR, you liken it to a pristine and fragile ecosystem of beautiful fauna and flora &#8211; it ain&#8217;t. It is a barren area of 2000 acres within a 19.5 million acre tract (it&#8217;s the size of a big airport). But, if the democrats win the election, there&#8217;s not likely to be much drilling of any sort &#8211; to that point, Joe Biden was 1 of 4 senators in 1973 to vote against the Alaskan pipeline (wow).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
