<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GREEN: Obama wants to make the White House green</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conservationreport.com/2008/11/28/green-obama-wants-to-make-the-white-house-green/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conservationreport.com/2008/11/28/green-obama-wants-to-make-the-white-house-green/</link>
	<description>Tracking news regarding conservation, the environment, energy, politics, and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 23:24:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Snyder</title>
		<link>http://conservationreport.com/2008/11/28/green-obama-wants-to-make-the-white-house-green/#comment-2225</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Snyder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 16:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservationreport.wordpress.com/?p=4369#comment-2225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Passive House Retrofit of the White House (www.passivehouse.us) would be very interesting - an exemplar of trying to reconcile the interests of energy efficiency with those of historic preservation. If one could do an ultra-efficient Passive House Retrofit there, one could do it anywhere! We don&#039;t buy new cars without a fuel efficiency rating, why should we spend 5 time more on our buildings without such a rating? Passive House Buildings are the only ones that come with a certification of energy-efficiency performance backed by over a decade of quality control protocols. The goal is maximum energy savings at minimal cost. See www.passivehouse.us to learn about this voluntary energy standard for buildings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Passive House Retrofit of the White House (www.passivehouse.us) would be very interesting &#8211; an exemplar of trying to reconcile the interests of energy efficiency with those of historic preservation. If one could do an ultra-efficient Passive House Retrofit there, one could do it anywhere! We don&#8217;t buy new cars without a fuel efficiency rating, why should we spend 5 time more on our buildings without such a rating? Passive House Buildings are the only ones that come with a certification of energy-efficiency performance backed by over a decade of quality control protocols. The goal is maximum energy savings at minimal cost. See <a href="http://www.passivehouse.us" rel="nofollow">http://www.passivehouse.us</a> to learn about this voluntary energy standard for buildings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sherry</title>
		<link>http://conservationreport.com/2008/11/28/green-obama-wants-to-make-the-white-house-green/#comment-1708</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sherry]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2008 21:36:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservationreport.wordpress.com/?p=4369#comment-1708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Will the call it the Green House when he is done :)
Jeff Wilson has a great new book out called The Manhattan Project of 2009 Energy Independence NOW. www.themanhattanprojectof2009.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will the call it the Green House when he is done <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
Jeff Wilson has a great new book out called The Manhattan Project of 2009 Energy Independence NOW. <a href="http://www.themanhattanprojectof2009.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.themanhattanprojectof2009.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

