CONSUMERISM: The Story of Stuff with Annie Leonard

Very recommended video (in case you haven’t seen it or need a refresher):

What is the Story of Stuff?

From its extraction through sale, use and disposal, all the stuff in our lives affects communities at home and abroad, yet most of this is hidden from view. The Story of Stuff is a 20-minute, fast-paced, fact-filled look at the underside of our production and consumption patterns. The Story of Stuff exposes the connections between a huge number of environmental and social issues, and calls us together to create a more sustainable and just world. It’ll teach you something, it’ll make you laugh, and it just may change the way you look at all the stuff in your life forever.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

POLITICS: Confirmation of top science picks on hold

Who in the Senate is upholding the approval of White House science adviser John Holdren and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) head Jane Lubchenco? From TPMDC:

To bring folks up to speed, it appeared initially that Sen. Robert Menendez (D-NJ) was the sole lawmaker standing in the nominees’ way, thanks to an unrelated dispute with Democratic leaders over the Cuban trade embargo. But that obstacle is no longer operative, leaving the situation murky as Commerce Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller (D-WV) references multiple holds on the nominees.

Yesterday we ruled out two GOP suspects, Sens. David Vitter (LA) and Mel Martinez (FL). Today we can strike two more likely suspects from the list: Sens. Jim Inhofe (R-OK) and John Barrasso (R-WY) both strongly oppose Holdren’s pro-regulation stance on climate change, but both told me they’re not behind the holds.

Inhofe couldn’t confirm that the holds weren’t coming from his environment committee, but he said flat out: “It’s not me, though.”

More from Scientific American:

The delay isn’t about the scientists’ credentials, but is being used by Sen. Robert Menendez (D–N.J.) as a bargaining chip to gain his colleagues’ support on a matter related to Cuba, according toThe Washington Post, citing an unidentified source. It’s not clear from the story what that matter is, but as the Nature blog The Great Beyond notes, Menendez has previously criticized the Castro regime. Menendez, who is Cuban-Americans, alsoopposes Senate legislation that would ease travel restrictions to the island nation.

The full Senate must vote on the nominees, and any senator can place a hold on the votes. If Menendez doesn’t drop his objection, Senate leaders could force a vote to break the hold. Both have already been through confirmation hearings. Holdren, a 64-year-old physicist, has pushed for aggressive action to stop global warming, and marine biologist Lubchenco, 61, has criticized NOAA for not doing enough to prevent overfishing. Holdren is on leave from Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government, where he most recently was director of the program on science, technology, and public policy. Lubchenco is a professor of marine biology and zoology at Oregon State University.

And from MSNBC:

The reasons for the delay are murky: Any senator can put a hold on a confirmation vote, and for a time it looked as if the culprit was Sen. Robert Menendez, D-N.J. But late last week, Menendez’s office told Talking Points Memo that the senator was no longer standing in the way. So who is?

Lubchenco has faced some criticism from Eastern fishing interests, but it’s Holdren who has generated the most controversy. Some worry that Holdren holds extreme views on the global climate crisis, and that science policies might be slanted to fit those views. That’s made him a lightning rod for commentators sounding the alarm about a “Democrat War on Science.”

Mooney addressed those worries in a Science Progress blog posting in December and is keeping an eye on the controversy. In Mooney’s view, the opposition is a political reaction to the years of criticism that Bush faced on the integrity issue. “What could be more obvious than to try to do a 180 and flip it, and say, ‘No, it’s Obama who’s trying to get political’?” Mooney said.

For whatever reason, Holdren’s appointment remains on hold – and thus Obama’s plan for improving scientific integrity may have to be put on hold as well.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

POLITICS: The Grand Obstructionist Party

Bennett editorial cartoonCongressional and Senate Republicans (and some gubernatorial Republicans) are practicing political opportunism at a very inconvenient time.

Currently, the Republican strategy to win back America is to hold up conformations (openly and anonymously), happily accept stimulus money for their districts—although they are  explicitly against the stimulus (or deciding not to accept federal money), take the position that bipartisanship means to implement their agenda (but at the same time blame President Obama for the bipartisian divide), and to breed the gotcha culture in order to assert and regain importance—because it’s the only way they can.

Congressional and Senate Republicans have contributed no new ideas that remedy some of our greatest problems: (1) securing adequate energy for the future, (2) balancing diverse competing interests, (3) fixing the financial debacle, (4) solving environmental degradation amongst a culture of unsustainable consumption, and (5) implementing a foreign policy that doesn’t cultivate negative attitudes towards the United States. From New York Times columnist Thomas L. Friedman:

Meanwhile, the Republican Party behaves as if it would rather see the country fail than Barack Obama succeed. Rush Limbaugh, the de facto G.O.P. boss, said so explicitly, prompting John McCain to declare about President Obama to Politico: “I don’t want him to fail in his mission of restoring our economy.” The G.O.P. is actually debating whether it wants our president to fail. Rather than help the president make the hard calls, the G.O.P. has opted for cat calls. It would be as if on the morning after 9/11, Democrats said they wanted no part of any war against Al Qaeda — “George Bush, you’re on your own.”

As for President Obama, I like his coolness under fire, yet sometimes it feels as if he is deliberately keeping his distance from the banking crisis, while pressing ahead on other popular initiatives. I understand that he doesn’t want his presidency to be held hostage to the ups and downs of bank stocks, but a hostage he is. We all are.

On the Net:

  1. Bypassing [Republican] Haley Barbour, Mississippi House votes to accept all recovery package funds
  2. Approval Ratings on the Rise for Congressional Democrats

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

COMMODIFICATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES: Mother Nature doesn’t do bailouts

trash-mountainMost folks don’t grasp or understand that we humans live in a limited world (or truly comprehend that our goods and services, electricity, air, and water depend on natural processes and natural resources—many of which are nonrenewable, meaning gone forever).

We should be teaching our children the responsibilities of living in a limited world and the consequences of over consumption.

Environmentalism and conservation are very important concepts, and as environmental degradation increases, these movements or ideas will continue to grow stronger. From the New York Times:

“We created a way of raising standards of living that we can’t possibly pass on to our children,” said Joe Romm, a physicist and climate expert who writes the indispensable blog climateprogress.org. We have been getting rich by depleting all our natural stocks — water, hydrocarbons, forests, rivers, fish and arable land — and not by generating renewable flows.

.       .       .

Over a billion people today suffer from water scarcity; deforestation in the tropics destroys an area the size of Greece every year — more than 25 million acres; more than half of the world’s fisheries are over-fished or fished at their limit.

“Just as a few lonely economists warned us we were living beyond our financial means and overdrawing our financial assets, scientists are warning us that we’re living beyond our ecological means and overdrawing our natural assets,” argues Glenn Prickett, senior vice president at Conservation International. But, he cautioned, as environmentalists have pointed out: “Mother Nature doesn’t do bailouts.”

.       .       .

For starters, economies need to transition to the concept of net-zero, whereby buildings, cars, factories and homes are designed not only to generate as much energy as they use but to be infinitely recyclable in as many parts as possible. Let’s grow by creating flows rather than plundering more stocks.

Gilding says he’s actually an optimist. So am I. People are already using this economic slowdown to retool and reorient economies. Germany, Britain, China and the U.S. have all used stimulus bills to make huge new investments in clean power. South Korea’s new national paradigm for development is called: “Low carbon, green growth.” Who knew? People are realizing we need more than incremental changes — and we’re seeing the first stirrings of growth in smarter, more efficient, more responsible ways.


Photo source for attribution. The author or licensor of this image does not endorse my work or me and their image is protected under an attribution license.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook