OCEAN ACIDIFICATION: Emissions from burning fossil fuels impacting ocean ecosystems

The oceans are a natural carbon sink, so as we burn more fossil fuels and release more carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, ocean pH drops, and oceans become more acidic. As a result, ocean ecosystems are impacted, because calcifying organisms find it harder to exist in these increasingly acidic conditions, because “as the water naturally absorbs carbon dioxide from the air, it forms carbonic acid, [and] the acid then mops up calcium carbonate, a substance normally plentiful in the oceans that sea creatures use to make the protective shells that they need to survive.” Certainly, it’s time for George Will to explain how and why the scientific majority has gotten ocean acidification wrong in his Washington Post column (like he did with global warming).

A clip from ABC News discussing ocean acidification with Sylvia Earle

From the guardian.co.uk:

Human pollution is turning the seas into acid so quickly that the coming decades will recreate conditions not seen on Earth since the time of the dinosaurs, scientists will warn today.

The rapid acidification is caused by the massive amounts of carbon dioxide belched from chimneys and exhausts that dissolve in the ocean. The chemical change is placing “unprecedented” pressure on marine life such as shellfish and lobsters and could cause widespread extinctions, the experts say.

.       .       .

Ken Caldeira, an expert on ocean acidification at the Carnegie Institution in California, will tell the conference that the next few decades could produce “profound” changes in the oceans. He will say: “The choice to continue emitting carbon dioxide means that we will be an agent of biological change of a force and magnitude exceeded only by the causes of the great mass extinction events. If we do not cut carbon dioxide emissions deeply and soon, the consequences of ocean acidification will stand out against the broad reaches of geologic time. Those consequences will remain embedded in the geologic record as testimony from a civilisation that had the wisdom to develop high technology, but did not develop the wisdom to use it wisely.”

Other experts will report that acidification is already affecting marine life in the Arctic and Antarctic. They will also discuss a bizarre finding that acid waters carry sound more efficiently, so the ocean will be a much noisier place in future.

From Science Daily:

The impact on reefs is a consequence of both ocean acidification caused by the absorption of carbon dioxide into seawater and rising water temperatures. Previous studies have shown that rising carbon dioxide will slow coral growth, but this is the first study to show that coral reefs can be expected to start dissolving just about everywhere in just a few decades, unless carbon dioxide emissions are cut deeply and soon.

“Globally, each second, we dump over 1000 tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere and, each second, about 300 tons of that carbon dioxide is going into the oceans,” said co-author Ken Caldeira of the Carnegie Institution’s Department of Global Ecology, testifying to the U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee on Insular Affairs, Oceans and Wildlife of the Committee on Natural Resources on February 25, 2009. “We can say with a high degree of certainty that all of this CO2 will make the oceans more acidic – that is simple chemistry taught to freshman college students.”

The study was designed determine the impact of this acidification on coral reefs. The research team, consisting of Jacob Silverman, Caldeira, and Long Cao of the Carnegie Institution as well as Boaz Lazar and Jonathan Erez from The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, used field data from coral reefs to determine the effects of temperature and water chemistry on coral calcification rates. Armed with this information, they plugged the data into a computer model that calculated global seawater temperature and chemistry at different atmospheric levels of CO2 ranging from the pre-industrial value of 280 ppm (parts per million) to 750 ppm. The current atmospheric concentration is over 380 ppm, and is rapidly rising due to human-caused emissions, primarily through the burning of fossil fuels.

Based on the model results for more than 9,000 reef locations, the researchers determined that at the highest concentration studied, 750 ppm, acidification of seawater would reduce calcification rates of three quarters of the world’s reefs to less than 20% of pre-industrial rates. Field studies suggest that at such low rates, coral growth would not be able to keep up with dissolution and other natural as well as manmade destructive processes attacking reefs.

More from Science Daily:

She has performed extensive studies of the sea urchin that lives in the kelp forests of California. Sea urchins are a vital part of the food web and play a major economic role in California fisheries, since the roe of the sea urchin is a valuable sushi called “uni.”

Hofmann explained that as marine invertebrates deal with increasing acidity, the larvae have to “re-tune” their metabolism in order to still make a shell. But this is done at a cost. The physiological changes that are a response to the acidity make the animals less able to withstand warmer waters, and they are smaller.

“These observations suggest that the ‘double jeopardy’ situation —- warming and acidifying seas —- will be a complex environment for future marine organisms,” she said.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

LIGHT POLLUTION to increase as population and energy use increases

artificial-lightThe International Dark-Sky Association defines light pollution as “any adverse effect of artificial light including sky glow, glare, light trespass, light clutter, decreased visibility at night, and energy waste.” Ecosystems or natural landscapes, animals, plants, and human health are negatively affected by light pollution. Via Andrew Sullivan, and the image was found here

CRITICALLY ENDANGERED SPECIES: Javan rhinoceros very close to extinction

indonesia-javan-rhino21indonesia-javan-rhino

Rhinoceroses are some of the most extraordinary creatures on the planet, and these large horned mammals with their thick armor-like skin are flagship species for conservation, since these animals represent a fast disappearing class of animals—the megafauna—which are often slow to reproduce, overexploited by humans, and the subject of human-wildlife conflicts as adequate habitat and wilderness lands continue to disappear.

People tend to associate the rhino with Africa. However, rhinos are found from India down through Southeast Asia, and some of the most endangered species of rhino are found outside of Africa (although all species of rhino are threatened with extinction).

The Javan rhino (Rhinoceros sondaicus) is threatened by poaching in addition to habitat degradation, loss, and fragmentation. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species lists the Javan rhino as critically endangered, and the Red List justifies a critical status, because the population is severely fragmented: “This species is listed as Critically Endangered because there are less than 50 mature individuals; and because there fewer than 250 mature individuals, with no subpopulation greater than 50 individuals.” As a result, some populations of Javan rhinos “may be too small to be viable, and no breeding has been observed for many years, and it is possible that the animals are too old to breed.”

There were three subspecies of the Javan rhino: (1) Rhinoceros sondaicus sondaicus, which is restricted to the “westernmost extremity of the island of Java;” (2) Rhinoceros sondaicus inermis, which “formerly occurred in northeastern India, Bangladesh, and Myanmar, but is now extinct;” and (3) Rhinoceros sondaicus annamiticus is found only in Viet Nam. Curiously, the Red List notes that the Javan rhino may be restricted to or forced to live out an existence in less than ideal habitat, since the “species formerly occurred in more open mixed forest and grassland and on high mountains.” Captive breeding, reintroductions, and translocations are recommended for the long-term survival of this species. From Sky News:

Conservation groups say the Javan Rhino is now the most endangered mammal in the world because of its extremely low birthrate.

There are only 60 of the animals left in the wild, and nearly all of those live in an Indonesian National Park.

Christy Williams from the World Wildlife Fund says the park has reached its maximum capacity of rhinos.

He says “We need to take immediate, urgent action to try to move some of these rhinos to another suitable site, either on Java or Sumatra island.”

“If we don’t act quickly, I think we could lose this population.”

Out of the 50 Javan rhinos that live in Ujung Kulon National Park, only three of the females are breeding continuously.

Therefore only one Javan rhino is born every year, which is four times fewer than necessary to sustain a healthy, growing population.

Researchers say the small population of the species living in Vietnam are no longer breeding at all.

Camera traps capturing the Javan Rhinoceros

The World Wildlife Fund releases footage of a small family of Javan rhinos in the Ujung Kulon National Park

Javan rhino attacks camera

The first Javan Rhino image is by WWF, and it was found here. The second image is by Alain Compost, and it was found here. Browse more Javan rhino images here.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

WETLANDS: Michigan may hand wetlands permitting back to Feds

Michigan’s “state regulations [for wetlands] are more restrictive than those enforced by federal authorities,” but jurisdiction to regulate wetlands may be handed over to the federal government in order to save Michigan a few million dollars.  From the New York Times:

Michigan officials say it is a last-resort move that will save $2 million.

“This is a program that has been underfunded in Michigan for a number of years now, and without any new support to increase the funding for the program, we were really left in a position where we couldn’t afford to take any more cuts to the program and still be able to administer it,” said Bob McCann, spokesman for the state Department of Environmental Quality, or DEQ.

“Frankly, it’s not something that we’ve chosen to do for any reason other than we don’t feel we have any other options, unless someone wants to come to the table with a proposal to really restore funding for this program back to where it needs to be.”

.       .       .

Environmentalists also say the move could threaten the Great Lakes. Jeff Ruch, executive director of Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility, called the bill a huge step backward, particularly after President Obama proposed a nearly $500 million task force aimed at restoring the Great Lakes in his fiscal 2010 budget plan.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

CLEAN COAL: Senate wants EPA to produce new coal ash regulations

The Senate is pressuring the EPA to promulgate new regulations managing coal ash. From Environment & Energy Daily:

In 2000, EPA produced a draft regulatory determination that said certain fossil fuel combustion wastes like coal ash should be regulated as a hazardous waste under RCRA, but no regulations have ever been promulgated.

Senate EPW Committee staff member Bettina Poirier said the Senate resolution is a largely symbolic gesture intended to demonstrate that EPA has the authority under RCRA to produce new coal ash regulations. “The notion of the resolution is we don’t have to have legislation for action to occur,” she explained.

While no hearings are planned for the resolution, Poirier said sponsors will attempt to gather more supporters before bringing it to a vote “to provide very public support for the action EPA takes.”

EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said last week that the agency is primarily focused on its enforcement and response to the spill and ensuring that other facilities manage their impoundments better than TVA did in Tennessee, but she said EPA will likely produce new regulations soon.

.       .       .

Earlier this week, more than 100 environmental groups sent a letter to Jackson saying federal standards are needed to govern the disposal of coal combustion waste. The groups described coal ash waste as a huge threat, noting that nearly 100 million tons of coal ash and coal combustion waste are dumped in ponds, pits and mines across the United States each year.

Related headlines:

Coal ash will be dredged from the Emory River.  From MSNBC.com:

Environmental regulators also approved the start of dredging to remove ash from the Emory River. Until now, officials have been stabilizing the ash and working on a plan, said Anda Ray, the Tennessee Valley Authority’s top environmental officer.

Some 5.4 million cubic feet of coal ash, a byproduct of burning coal to make electricity, breached an earthen retention wall at the Kingston Fossil Plant about 40 miles west of Knoxville on Dec. 22.

Residents of the Tennessee coal ash spill are worried about their health, and some are complaining of respiratory problems. From WAAYTV.com:

Tennessee and federal environmental officials are encouraged with the progress in cleaning up a massive coal ash spill, but residents worry their health is being compromised.

Paul Davis, Tennessee’s top environmental officer, told more than 200 people attending a community meeting on the spill Thursday night in Harriman that “we appreciate to the fullest extent that we can the impact of this spill on you.” He vowed “total remediation” of the 300 acres that were covered by 5.4 million cubic yards of ash near the Kingston Fossil Plant on Dec. 22.

But Rick Cantrell with a residents’ group said the community is worried about coal dust in the air and in their homes. Some are complaining of trouble breathing and other illnesses.

Not only is TVA having legal trouble from the toxic coal ash spill but also out of control credit card spending is causing problems. From the Institute of Southern Studies:

The Tennessee Valley Authority, already caught in a legal quagmire following December’s disastrous spill of a billion gallons of coal ash from its Kingston power plant, is in trouble yet again — this time for out-of-control credit card spending by its employees.

A two-year review by TVA’s Inspector General found that spending as part of a program created in 1995 for minor business-related expenses had ballooned to more than $75 million annually

Homeowners are upset with performance bonus and pay raise accepted by Tennessee Valley Authority’s CEO as electricity rates shoot up. From MSNBC.com

When electric bills across Tennessee recently shot up, homeowners and lawmakers went after the TVA’s top man, CEO Tom Kilgore, and his $1 million bonus — a paycheck that became a real turn-off to rate payers.

His nearly $2.5 million paycheck is adding to the anger of everyday people who are struggling to pay their bills.

The public was angered by October’s rate increase. At that same time, Kilgore accepted a pay raise.

The end of wet fly ash storage may be over. From the Knoxville News Sentinel:

The spill near Harriman three days before Christmas most likely spells the end for wet storage at the steam plant, according to a mandatory corrective action plan submitted Monday to the state Department of Environment and Conservation. Any such transition would be subject to state approval and would take about two years.

“TVA has committed to ceasing wet ash storage in the failed dredge cell,” according to the plan. “In order to manage future ash production, TVA is considering the installation of equipment that enables the fly ash from Kingston to be collected dry. Collecting fly ash on a dry basis will allow for more flexible marketing and disposal options and reduce the size of pond structures. … If the decision is made to convert to dry collection, the time from project start to completion is expected to take 18-24 months.”

The spill has raised questions across the state and around the nation about the safety of coal ash and how to store it.

State Sen. Tim Burchett, R-Knoxville, introduced a bill Tuesday that would ban wet storage of fly ash.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook