GREEN ENERGY: Jones Soda Co. goes off the grid for Earth Day

Burning and converting stored fat and calories into energy that runs computers, fax machines, lights, and electricity—that’s what the employees at Jones Soda did by using cyclists on Earth Day to power its Seattle headquarters. From the Seattle Post Intelligencer:

Employees and others at the soda pop company began pedaling at 5 a.m. Wednesday, taking turns on nine stationery bikes hooked up to batteries to store the energy.

“We’ve actively been working on improving sustainability across the entire company,” said CEO-elect Joth Ricci. This was a good way to kick off an initiative to conserve electricity and reduce packaging waste, he said.

One cyclist pedaling at a comfortable pace could generate about 200 watts an hour, enough to run a medium-sized TV or a dishwasher without the heat dry.

To supplement the human-powered energy, the company also dialed back its electricity consumption. It turned off lights in the office, except lights in the restrooms, which were run by the bicycles. And employees huddled with laptops in two main rooms to take advantage of natural light from a skylight and windows.

The event brought out environmentalists, cycling enthusiasts and other curious gawkers.

Charlie Weber, 26, of Spokane, was cycling past the company’s office when event volunteers flagged him down and asked him to take a spin on one of the bikes. He rode for about 20 minutes.

“It’s a great way to get people aware of Earth Day,” said the medical resident at Deaconess Medical Center in Spokane. “A good, healthy way to do it.”

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

CONSERVATION: Gorillas need your help

gorilla2009 is the year of the gorilla.  Habitat degradation, loss, and fragmentation in addition to the Ebola virus—a fatal zoonotic disease—and the bushmeat trade threaten these great primates.  Allie Wilkinson at “OH, FOR THE LOVE OF SCIENCE!” is doing her part by “participating in the 5K Run for the Wild.” You can help Allie by donating here. From Allie’s blog:

Ebola is reducing once healthy populations to a level where they are no longer resilient to other threats, such as poaching. Between ebola and poaching, it is estimated that the existing world population of gorillas could become extinct in the wild in the next 10 to 20 years.

Ebola in gorillas and other great apes may actually be preventable through vaccination, which has already been proven effective in monkeys. At least six experimental vaccines have protected laboratory monkeys from ebola virus. It takes a significant amount of funding to adapt the current ebola vaccine into one that will be safe and effective for great apes. People may be intimidated by the cost of vaccination, but one year of ebola vaccination could save as many apes as decades of anti-poaching.

“When people look back 100 years from now, most won’t even remember Iraq. One thing they will remember is that we sat by and did nothing while our closest relatives slipped away,” says Peter Walsh of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Antropology in Germany. ”This is a case where one wealthy individual could have an enormous impact. He or she could quite literally save gorillas from ecological extinction.”


Photo source for attribution. The author or licensor of this image does not endorse my work or me and their image is protected under an attribution license.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

NEW SPECIES of microbes found surviving in extreme environments—the stratosphere and isolated under an Antarctic glacier

yellowstone-bacteria-hot-springMicrobial life is known to survive in some of the most extreme environments on the plant: around deep-sea hydrothermal vents, within hot acid springs (the image at right shows a hot spring in Yellowstone National Park), or deep within caves.  To add to this impressive list, scientists have recently found microbes surviving in the stratosphere and underneath glaciers in the Antarctic.

The stratosphere is the “portion of the Earth’s atmosphere ranging from approximately 14 km to 22 km (8 to 12 miles),” and it contains the ozone layer. The discovery of bacteria that can withstand intense bombardment of ultraviolet radiation fuels the theory that Earth was colonized by microbial life from space. However, some scientists believe that these new species of microbes are not unique to the stratosphere and may have been picked up by dust storms.

Nonetheless, the discovery illustrates the durability and versatility of life. Europa—one of Jupiter’s many moons—is perhaps the best shot to finding life in our solar system, and given the vastness of the universe, certainly life isn’t unique to planet Earth.  Although, intelligent life might be extremely rare (see the Fermi Paradox). From the Indian Space Research Organisation:

In all, 12 bacterial and six fungal colonies were detected, nine of which, based on 16S RNA gene sequence, showed greater than 98% similarity with reported known species on earth. Three bacterial colonies, namely, PVAS-1, B3 W22 and B8 W22 were, however, totally new species. All the three newly identified species had significantly higher UV resistance compared to their nearest phylogenetic neighbours. Of the above, PVAS-1, identified as a member of the genus Janibacter, has been named Janibacter hoylei. sp. nov. The second new species B3 W22 was named as Bacillus isronensis sp.nov. and the third new species B8 W22 as Bacillus aryabhata.

The precautionary measures and controls operating in this experiment inspire confidence that these species were picked up in the stratosphere. While the present study does not conclusively establish the extra-terrestrial origin of microorganisms, it does provide positive encouragement to continue the work in our quest to explore the origin of life.

Are these new microbes an extraterrestrial species? From Wired News:

Not so fast, said University of Washington astrobiologist John Baross.
“It is extremely unlikely that these organisms are extraterrestrial,” wrote Baross in an email, “and they are likely to originate from soil on Earth.”

Bacteria is often found in the stratosphere, and most can be traced to wind-borne dust particles. That the new species were previously unknown means little. Scientists have identified just one percent of all Earthly bacteria. And though the species hadn’t been seen, their gene sequences were familiar; they represent a variation on known life, rather than an entirely new form.

But they might still be useful, said Baross. For years, researchers have wondered if bacteria might be capable not only of surviving space, but growing in it. If the new bugs turn out to thrive at the edges of Earth’s atmosphere — baked by solar radiation and deprived of liquid water, at Antarctic temperatures — researchers can study them to learn how a spacecraft-riding terrestrial microbe contaminate another extreme-but-liveable environment, such as the surface of Mars.

With no replenishing supply of nutrients or photosynthesis, bacteria are surviving isolated underneath a glacier in Antarctica. From Chemistry World:

Researchers in the US and the UK have found microbes in the Antarctic that appear to have survived in isolation, without sunlight or new supplies of nutrients, for more than a million years. The discovery suggests that similar microbes could have survived the supposed ‘snowball Earth’ periods, when our planet may have been covered by ice, or could even exist elsewhere in the solar system.

.       .       .

Jill Mikucki of Harvard University and others have found one of the most isolated forms of life ever discovered. They have taken samples from Blood Falls, a reddish outlet of fluid on an edge of the Taylor Glacier in Antarctica. The fluid comes from a pocket of very salty ancient seawater that was trapped in the glacier between 1.5 and 4 million years ago. DNA analysis showed that it contained several different types of microbe, while chemical analysis revealed a crucial absence of oxygen, the characteristic by-product of photosynthesis.

.       .       .

The researchers suggest that microbes relying on a similar ‘sulphur cycle’ could have existed at periods in the Earth’s history when some paleoclimatologists think most of the surface was covered in ice and there would have been little photosynthesis. Moreover, they say the trapped fluid deposit at Blood Falls could function as a laboratory for the study of possible life in other harsh environments, including Mars’s frozen icecaps and Jupiter’s icy moon, Europa.

Bo Barker Jorgenson, a microbial ecologist at the Max-Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology in Bremen, Germany, thinks the study is ‘very interesting’ but notes that there are possibly more isolated forms of life, such as bacteria that are known to have lived on deep seabeds for over 100 million years. ‘Whether [the study] sheds new light on the potential for microbial life during snowball Earth periods, I am not so sure,’ he adds.

More from Popular Science:

Further analysis revealed that the microorganisms were more similar to marine organisms than to those found on land, which led to the conclusion that the ancestors of the microbes living under Taylor Glacier probably lived in the ocean at one time. When the floor of the Dry Valleys rose more than 1.5 million years ago, a pool of seawater was trapped and then eventually covered by the glacier when it advanced. The researchers believe that, with no light to make food through photosynthesis, the microbes adapted over 1.5 million years to use sulfur and iron compounds to survive.

The microbes’ similarity to other marine species suggests that the community under the glacier may be the remnant of a larger population that once occupied a fjord or sea, where they would have received sunlight. When the Taylor Glacier advanced, sealing off the microbes’ habitat under a thick ice cap, some of the population probably declined, while others were able to adapt to the changing environment. Mikucki said the briny pond “is a unique sort of time capsule from a period in Earth’s history.”


Photo source for attribution. The author or licensor of this image does not endorse my work or me and their image is protected under an attribution license.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

HAPPY EARTH DAY! (Now turn off your computer and go play outside, but enjoy the environment responsibly)

earth

Image Found Here

CLIMATE CHANGE: What’s the Republican answer to climate change? Let’s hope it’s not House Minority Leader John Boehner

The Republican answer to climate change is to do nothing according to Republicans like House Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio). He made it clear over the weekend while being interviewed on “This Week with George Stephanopoulos” that he is ignorant of issues pertaining to climate change. The reality is that we elect our officials to office expecting them to make policy decisions objectively in order to remedy the country’s issues, but we shouldn’t be electing people like Boehner to public office, because he obviously hasn’t even attempted to do his homework or basic research in order to understand anthropogenic climate change.

John Boehner’s assertion that carbon dioxide is not a problem, since cows and humans exhale the gas, is wrong. The problem is the release of trapped carbon into the atmosphere, which is resulting in anthropogenic global warming; so extracting, converting, and pumping millions of tons of hydrocarbons (coal, crude oil, natural gas, etc.) into the atmosphere yearly, is impacting the Earth and its climate. The problem with climate change—unlike polluting waterways or the air—is that it’s not readily observable, so it’s easily politicized.

To further illustrate the issue, contrast the burning of hydrocarbons like coal, petroleum, and natural gases with biomass, “because plants use carbon dioxide from the atmosphere to grow (photosynthesis), the carbon dioxide formed during combustion is balanced by that absorbed during the annual growth of the plants used as the biomass feedstock—unlike burning fossil fuels which releases carbon dioxide captured billions of years ago.” Biomass is an attractive alternative for some because it doesn’t add additional CO2 like fossil fuels do (although this depends on the type of feedstock burned and how the feedstock is produced).

According to Politico, Senator John Boehner’s spokesperson Antonia Ferrier attempted to clarify his position: “The point he was trying to make, Ferrier said, is that ‘when you’re talking about labeling a naturally occurring gas like carbon dioxide a pollutant, there are going to be some real-world ramifications for doing that.’” Again, Boehner fails to grasp the issue.

Here is the video of George Stephanopoulos interviewing House Minority Leader John Boehner:

Transcript of House Republican Minority Leader Rep. John Boehner on “This Week with George Stephanopoulos”:

STEPHANOPOULOS: Let me ask you then about energy. We showed your statement on the president’s decision through the EPA to regulate greenhouse gases. Also, you’ve come out against the president’s proposal to cap-and-trade carbon emissions.

So what is the Republican answer to climate change? Is it a problem? Do you have a plan to address it?

BOEHNER: George, we believe that our — all of the above energy strategy from last year continues to be the right approach on energy. That we ought to make sure that we have new sources of energy, green energy, but we need nuclear energy, we need other types of alternatives, and, yes, we need American-made oil and gas.

STEPHANOPOULOS: But that doesn’t do anything when it comes to emissions, sir.

BOEHNER: When it comes to the issue of climate change, George, it’s pretty clear that if we don’t work with other industrialized nations around the world, what’s going to happen is that we’re going to ship millions of American jobs overseas. We have to deal with this in a responsible way.

STEPHANOPOULOS: So what is the responsible way? That’s my question. What is the Republican plan to deal with carbon emissions, which every major scientific organization has said is contributing to climate change?

BOEHNER: George, the idea that carbon dioxide is a carcinogen that is harmful to our environment is almost comical. Every time we exhale, we exhale carbon dioxide. Every cow in the world, you know, when they do what they do, you’ve got more carbon dioxide. And so I think it’s clear…

STEPHANOPOULOS: So you don’t believe that greenhouse gases are a problem in creating climate change?

BOEHNER: … we’ve had climate change over the last 100 years — listen, it’s clear we’ve had change in our climate. The question is how much does man have to do with it, and what is the proper way to deal with this? We can’t do it alone as one nation. If we got India, China and other industrialized countries not working with us, all we’re going to do is ship millions of American jobs overseas.

STEPHANOPOULOS: But it sounds like from what you’re saying that you don’t believe that Republicans need to come up with a plan to control carbon emissions? You’re suggesting it’s not that big of a problem, even though the scientific consensus is that it has contributed to the climate change.

BOEHNER: I think it is — I think it is an issue. The question is, what is the proper answer and the responsible answer?

STEPHANOPOULOS: And what is the answer? That’s what I’m trying to get at.

BOEHNER: George, I think everyone in America is looking for the proper answer. We don’t want to raise taxes, $1.5 to $2 trillion like the administration is proposing, and we don’t want to ship millions of American jobs overseas. And so we’ve got to find ways to work toward this solution to this problem without risking the future for our kids and grandkids.

STEPHANOPOULOS: So you are committed to coming up with a plan?

BOEHNER: I think you’ll see a plan from us. Just like you’ve seen a plan from us on the stimulus bill and a better plan on the budget.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook