STREET ART conveys political and social messages

The best from Flickr: Thought provoking street art by Banksy and other artists

Banksy in Birmingham: Of course, the artwork was quickly spray painted over

Banksy BirminghamPhoto source for attribution here

Banksy in New Orleans with Rain Girl

BanksyPhoto source for attribution here

Gray Ghost Revenge!

BanksyPhoto source for attribution here

Yellow Lines Flower Painter

BanksyPhoto source for attribution here

Take This Society

BanksyPhoto source for attribution here

Stop and Search: How far should we go? How far can we go?

BanksyImage found here

Balloon Girl

BanksyPhoto source for attribution here

Bomb Hugger . The fragility of society—with its cities, infrastructure, and markets—is often unobserved or ignored.

Banksy Bomb HuggerImage found here

Video: Banksy Versus Bristol Museum

More here: Clandestine artist leaves his mark on New Orleans’ streets

Other political graffiti (authors unknown)

“There must be some kind of way out of here . . .” Banksy?

Shopping CartPhoto source for attribution here

Representing detainee in orange jumpsuit at U.S. Naval Base in Guantánamo Bay, Cuba

Political GraffitiPhoto source for attribution here

Consumerism can’t lead to happiness

GraffitiPhoto source for attribution here. Photo by Dave Knapik.

Reliance on fossil fuels is suicide

OilPhoto source for attribution here

Obama over Banksy

ObamaPhoto source for attribution here

A take on Norman Rockwell’s The Problem We All Live With, inspired by Banksy’s Balloon Girl

The Problem We All Live WithPhoto source for attribution here

The authors or licensors of these images do not endorse my work or me and their images are protected under an attribution license.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

POLITICS: Was South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford’s vanishing act brilliant?

Objectively speaking, South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford’s vanishing act is perplexing, unreasonable, and reveals a lack of prudence. Contrarily, conservative columnist Kathleen Parker interprets Mark Sanford’s shenanigans as “brilliant.” Contrarily, Mark McKinnon argues, “The South Carolina governor isn’t an irresponsible lunatic for wandering off the reservation—he just made himself a better bet for president in 2012.” Not hardly. To borrow a quote from Number Six: “You have an amazing capacity for self-deception. How do you do that?

Actually, given Republican reaction towards key issues like environmental degradation, climate change, health care reform, or the situation in Iran (or the blind support of former president George W. Bush and his Iraq debacle) in addition to strategically disagreeing with President Obama on just about every issue, Number Six’s quote could be: “[Republicans] have an amazing capacity for self-deception. How do [they] do that?”

Mark SanfordFurthermore, a poll from WYFF4.com of Greenville, S.C., as of this morning, shows that about 91% believe it wasn’t appropriate for S.C. governor Mark Sanford to leave and not tell anyone. Sometimes, truth is unavoidable.

I agree with this assessment:

Whether right or wrong, politics is a game of perception. And if Governor Sanford’s goal is the national stage, this “disappearance” act just looks wrong on so many levels. He is going to be perceived as “flaky” and “irresponsible”, because of this “stunt”. This is not about a guy just getting away for a few days without a cell phone. This is about whether or not Sanford has what it takes to run for President of the United States. And right now it looks like he doesn’t have “it”.

Update 1: Republican South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford is a Democrat according to Fox News:

Mark Sanford

Update 2: What South Carolina residents are saying about the Mark Sanford debacle:

Update 3The State, South Carolina’s largest newspaper, published emails between Mark Sanford and a woman in Argentina; but should these emails have been published or remained private? I’m guessing he sent these emails from his state government account. At most job sites—especially in the government—employees working in information technology have access to electronic mail or even an employee’s work computer.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

AUTO INDUSTRY: Obama Administration, Department of Energy award loans to Tesla Motors, Ford Motor Company, and Nissan for the development of innovative, advanced vehicle technologies

Tesla Electric CarAccording to the Department of Energy, Tesla Motors will receive $465 million in loan money to advance electric vehicles, Ford Motor Company will receive $5.9 billion in loans to finance engineering advances, and Nissan will receive $1.6 billion in loan money to produce electric cars and battery packs at a manufacturing complex in Smyrna, Tennessee.

This is the type of federal involvement that is needed to jumpstart the modern auto industry (in addition to the renewable energy industry and the modernization of the electrical grid). GM and Chrysler did not qualify for the loans, since these companies “are prevented from receiving aid under terms of the program because they do not qualify as ‘financially viable’ companies.”

No doubt, early adopters such as Toyota have been winners with their fuel-efficient vehicles. However, companies such as GM even until fairly recently chided any attempts to market fuel-efficient vehicles such as hybrids, and apparently the American auto company was instrumental in killing its own electric car program in the 1990s, which seemed very promising at the time. However, it appears that Ford is becoming a clear winner due to GM and Chrysler’s woes, since the automaker “has gained U.S. retail market share in seven of the past eight months and said it is attracting customers from GM and Chrysler.” Furthermore, the downfall of two of the Big Three has no doubt left room for smaller auto startups, such as Tesla, to begin entering the market. From the Department of Energy:

Today, the Obama Administration announced $8 billion in conditional loan commitments for the development of innovative, advanced vehicle technologies that will create thousands of green jobs while helping reduce the nation’s dangerous dependence on foreign oil. The loan commitments announced today by the President include $5.9 billion for Ford Motor Company to transform factories across Illinois, Kentucky, Michigan, Missouri, and Ohio to produce 13 more fuel efficient models; $1.6 billion to Nissan North America, Inc. to retool their Smyrna, Tennessee factory to build advanced electric automobiles and to build an advanced battery manufacturing facility; and $465 million to Tesla Motors to manufacture electric drive trains and electric vehicles in California.

These are the first conditional loan commitments reached as part of the Department of Energy’s Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing program. The Department plans to make additional loans under this program over the next several months to large and small auto manufacturers and parts suppliers up and down the production chain.

“We have an historic opportunity to help ensure that the next generation of fuel-efficient cars and trucks are made in America,” said President Obama. “These loans – and the additional support we will provide through the Section 136 program – will create good jobs and help the auto industry to meet and even exceed the tough fuel economy standards we’ve set, while helping us to regain our competitive edge in the world market.”

“By supporting key technologies and sound business plans, we can jumpstart the production of fuel efficient vehicles in America,” Energy Secretary Steven Chu said. “These investments will come back to our country many times over – by creating new jobs, reducing our dependence on oil, and reducing our greenhouse gas emissions.”

These commitments will help reduce the 140 billion gallons of gasoline Americans consume each year, lessening the nation’s dependence on the volatile world market for oil, and decreasing the cause of a fifth of the nation’s carbon emissions. The Obama Administration recently announced an agreement to raise passenger car fuel standards from 27.5 miles per gallon to a target of 35 miles per gallon (mpg) by 2016. While 35 mpg is ambitious, the Department of Energy’s auto loan program received more than a hundred applications for loans to help achieve greater fuel efficiency. The competition among advances in conventional engine technologies, next-generation biofuels, and transportation electrification holds the potential to increase US fuel efficiency dramatically over the next several years.

The Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing Loan Program is an open and competitive process focusing on the best companies and best technologies in American manufacturing. First appropriated in the fall of 2008, the program will provide about $25 billion in loans to companies making cars and components in US factories that increase fuel economy at least 25 percent above 2005 fuel economy levels. The intense technical and financial review process is focused not on choosing a single technology over others, but is aimed at promoting multiple approaches for achieving a fuel efficient economy.

Applications for the loan program have included vehicles running on electricity, biofuels, and advanced combustion engines, and were submitted by both car and component makers, US automakers, US manufacturing subsidiaries of non-US-based companies, major US auto parts suppliers, and innovative startups.

HIGHLY RECOMMENDED: Who Killed The Electric Car part 1 of 10



Photo source for attribution. The author or licensor of this image does not endorse my work or me and their image is protected under an attribution license.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

WATER POLLUTION: Cuyahoga River caught fire 40 years ago today

Cuyahoga River FireCuyahoga River FireOn June 22, 1969, the Cuyahoga River literally caught fire, and the subsequent public outrage was arguably the catalyst for environmental regulatory protections like the Clean Water Act. Another environmental disaster was a catalyst for environmentalism: “In the spring following the [Santa Barbara's 1969 Oil Spill], Earth Day was born nationwide.” Furthermore, in 1970 the National Environmental Policy Act or NEPA was signed into law.

A book by marine biologist and naturalist Rachel Carson—Silent Spring—was no doubt another important ingredient that fostered the modern environmental movement. However, although the mindset of out of sight, out of mind or the misunderstanding that Nature can absorb our waste without consequences, was historically a huge factor in our Nation’s environmental troubles, history seems to be repeating itself today. However, the difference today are our environmental regulatory protections. From The Plain Dealer:

The fire — a brief Sunday afternoon flare-up of oil-soaked debris likely ignited by either molten steel or a spark from a passing rail car — was doused by local firefighting tugboat crews. The story barely made the newspapers the next day.

But the effect of that two-hour flare-up has lasted four decades.

Today, the river fire stands as an enduring image of progress gone wrong.

But after so many years, it becomes difficult to really understand and feel the rampant water (and air) pollution of the industrial era that led to the Cuyahoga fire.

.       .       .

The image of a black, gooey hand coming out of the Cuyahoga like a B-movie swamp monster defined the plight of the Cuyahoga. By association, it indicted all industrial American cities — and a culture that for a century had generally viewed natural waterways as a means to an end.

“The Cuyahoga River — the thick pollution on the water and the fire — became a convenient example of what ‘bad’ really is,” said Frank Samsel, whose company aided in early 1970s cleanup efforts.

Video: “[Water pollution] is the shadow of progress”

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook