OFFSHORE DRILLING is not worth the risks

Energy PolicyOffshore DrillingRecently, “democrats in the US Senate . . . voted against an attempt by Republicans to keep a plan to allow oil and gas drilling along the Atlantic and Pacific coasts.”

Certainly, the push for offshore drilling by conservatives and republicans isn’t prudent energy policy. Offshore drilling is also shortsighted policy that doesn’t result in energy independence, so these offshore nonrenewable energy reserves should be preserved.

Furthermore, offshore drilling has seemingly insignificant but cumulative negative ecological impacts in addition to major negative ecological impacts. More from Dan DeWitt via Tampabay.com:

We would be able to see those rigs, of course, but not the releases of mercury and other toxins in the “mud” used to lubricate drill bits. There could be devastating spills such as the one coming from a wellhead (a modern, high-tech one, by the way) that is currently spewing thousands of barrels per day off the coast of Australia, or smaller ones that in the United States account for a total of 3,898 barrels, on average, every year, according to an industry group.

Drilling so close to shore means these spills would go directly into estuaries and seagrass beds off Hernando and Citrus that are vital to the gulf’s fishery.

BREAK

Drill Here Drill NowNewt Gingrich exhibits a lack of prudence by dishonestly blaming our energy crisis on “anti-energy, left-leaning politicians”:

Who are the “influential people” who “helped create the energy crisis in the first place” Gingrich and Haley blame? Is it BushCheneyHalliburtonEnronExxon MobilPeabody CoalTom DeLayJohn McCainhedge-fund speculators, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich himself, or others in the conservative elite who have profited from skyrocketing energy prices and prevented change while American families suffered?

Nope! The villians in Newtland are “anti-energy, left-leaning politicians.”

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

NEW SPECIES of bird-eating fanged frog discovered from Southeast Asia

Khorat Big-Mouthed FrogCat Ba Leopard GeckoTiger-Striped PitviperA World Wildlife Federation report highlights some fascinating new species discoveries from Southeast Asia. In addition to various species of amphibians and reptiles, “a new wild banana and, even rarer, two new types of mammal” were described as well. Researchers also discovered “feathers in the frog’s faeces, proving that it eats small birds.” More from CBS News:

A gecko with leopard-like spots on its body and a fanged frog that eats birds are among 163 new species discovered last year in the Mekong River region of Southeast Asia, an environmental group said Friday.WWF International said that scientists in 2008 discovered 100 plants, 28 fish, 18 reptiles, 14 amphibians, two mammals and one bird species in the region. That works out to be about three species a week and is in addition to the 1,000 new species catalogued there from 1997 to 2007, the group said.

.        .        .

Among the stars in the new list is a fanged frog in eastern Thailand. Given the scientific name Limnonectes megastomias, the frog lies in wait along streams for prey including birds and insects. Scientists believe it uses its fangs during combat with other males.

Another unusual discovery was the Cat Ba leopard gecko found on Cat Ba Island in northern Vietnam. Named Goniurosaurus catbaensis, it has large, orange-brown catlike eyes and leopard spots down the length of its yellowish brown body.

Lee Grismer, of La Sierra University in California, said he found a tiger-stripped pit viper in Vietnam described in the report while he was attempting to capture a second gecko species.

“We were engrossed in trying to catch a new species of gecko when my son pointed out that my hand was on a rock mere inches away from the head of a pit viper,” Grismer said in a statement. “We caught the snake and the gecko and they both proved to be new species.”

More at WWF

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

QUOTE

Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world’s data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts do not go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein’s theory of gravitation replaced Newton’s, but apples did not suspend themselves in mid-air, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from ape-like ancestors whether they did so by Darwin’s proposed mechanism or by some other yet to be discovered.

- Stephen Jay Gould

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

QUOTE

We are not an assimilative, homogeneous society, but a facilitative, pluralistic one, in which we must be willing to abide someone else’s unfamiliar or even repellant practice because the same tolerant impulse protects our own indiosyncracies.

- Justice Brennan in Michael H. v. Gerald D., 491 U.S. 110 (1989)

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

HEALTH: Bill Clinton believes health care reform will happen

Obviously, former President Bill Clinton is a good communicator, and the former President believes that we’ll have health care reform this time:

Whether you have insurance or not, our current health care system is an appalling or nightmarish quagmire for many folks. It’s baffling that our access to healthcare is so strongly tied to employment and private corporations. These private corporations make huge profits from managing our health, and their policies haven’t reflected what’s in the best interest of the public. For example, according to Physicians for a National Health Program:

PacifiCare denied 40 percent of all California claims in the first six months of 2009. Cigna, which gained notoriety two years ago for denying a liver transplant to 17-year-old Nataline Sarkisyan of Northridge, Calif. and then reversing itself, tragically too late to save her life, was still rejecting one-third of all claims for the first half of 2009.

The profitable practice of rescission:

To add insult to injury:

Some of the known salaries are pretty big. Last year, the head of Cigna (CI, Fortune 500) made $11 million and the head of United Health Group (UNH, Fortune 500) made $9.4 million, according to the Corporate Library.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook