POLITICS: The myth of Republican fiscal conservatism

The Republicans regularly claim that the deficits and the national debt are the handiwork of the Democrats and Democratic policies. However, the Republicans have been and still are the architects behind our fiscal situation. They’re also a major barrier to resolving the country’s current fiscal situation. It’s amazing that Republicans can keep up this fiction. Via Taegan Goddard’s Political Wire:

Federal Budget Reality Check

New York Times: “The parties share blame for the current fiscal situation, but federal budget statistics show that Republican policies over the last decade, and the cost of the two wars, added far more to the deficit than initiatives approved by the Democratic Congress since 2006, giving voters reason to be skeptical of campaign promises.”

“Calculations by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office and other independent fiscal experts show that the $1.1 trillion cost over the next 10 years of the Medicare prescription drug program, which the Republican-controlled Congress adopted in 2003, by itself would add more to the deficit than the combined costs of the bailout, the stimulus and the health care law.”

What about the bank bailout? It earned “an 8.2 percent return over two years.” Via Taegan Goddard’s Political Wire:

Bank Bailout Earned 8.2% Profit

The federal government’s bailout of financial firms “provided taxpayers with higher returns than they could have made buying 30-year Treasury bonds — enough money to fund the Securities and Exchange Commission for the next two decades,” Bloomberg reports.

“The government has earned $25.2 billion on its investment of $309 billion in banks and insurance companies, an 8.2 percent return over two years, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. That beat U.S. Treasuries, high-yield savings accounts, money-market funds and certificates of deposit. Investing in the stock market or gold would have paid off better.”

Also, Republicans who were opposed to the $787 billion stimulus bill requested funds from it. Via CBS News:

A rallying cry for many Republican candidates this fall is their fierce opposition to the $787 billion stimulus bill.

Texas Rep. Pete Sessions has been ripping the spending package, using such campaign lines as “no to budget-busting stimulus bills.”

Then there is this boast served up by Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann in an advertisement: “I fought against the Bush Wall Street bailout, the failed Pelosi trillion dollar stimulus.”

But it turns out no sooner was the ink dry on the stimulus bill than these lawmakers – and dozens of others from both parties – were reaching out behind the scenes for money to fund millions of dollars in local projects.

“When it came time to get a piece of the pie afterwards, people were writing letters by the dozens,” said John Solomon of the Center for Public Integrity.

That group says it collected nearly 2,000 letters from “scores” of Republicans and conservative Democrats requesting funds from a bill they originally opposed and many still criticize.

But that didn’t stop Massachusetts Sen. Scott Brown from asking for $45.4 million in funds or stop Sessions from requesting $81 million in stimulus money for a Texas rail project, a grant he did not win.

CBS News video:

Stimulus Hypocrisy – The Center for Public Integrity says that many Republican and Democratic politicians who were outspoken in their opposition against last year’s stimulus package actually requested funds from that very same project. Armen Keteyian reports.

On the Net:

  1. The Tea Party Timeline …
  2. Critics Still Wrong on What’s Driving Deficits in Coming Years: Economic Downturn, Financial Rescues, and Bush-Era Policies Drive the Numbers
  3. POLITICS: Tea Party hypocrisy and the myth of Republican fiscal conservatism

NATURE: The ghost mantis looks otherworldly

The ghost mantis, Phyllocrania paradoxa, is an unearthly-looking leaf-mimicking insect that specializes in camouflage and stealth to capture its prey. It “is a small species of praying mantis from Africa remarkable for its leaf-like body[, and] it is the sole member of the genus Phyllocrania.”

Images via Frupus on Flickr

Images via Wikipedia

Videos of the ghost mantis:



The author or licensor of these images does not endorse my work or me and their images are protected under an attribution license.

POLITICS: Tea Party-backed Christine O’Donnell is ignorant of the U.S. Constitution (and evolution)

Members of the Tea Party frequently claim that the federal government is destroying the U.S. Constitution, but although the Tea Party utilizes the phrase “Don’t Tread on Me,” the Tea Party is the first to tread on the U.S. Constitution with their shameless ignorance. In a recent debate with the Delaware U.S. Senate Democratic nominee Chris Coons, the Republican nominee and Tea Party-backed Christine O’Donnell said, “Where in the Constitution is the separation of church and state?” She also incorrectly declared that evolution isn’t a fact. However, evolution is both a fact and a theory. Intelligent design is a meticulously-crafted lie that was invented to compete with evolution, and intelligent design isn’t science. More via the late Stephen Jay Gould:

Well, evolution is a theory. It is also a fact. And facts and theories are different things, not rungs in a hierarchy of increasing certainty. Facts are the world’s data. Theories are structures of ideas that explain and interpret facts. Facts do not go away when scientists debate rival theories to explain them. Einstein’s theory of gravitation replaced Newton’s, but apples did not suspend themselves in mid-air, pending the outcome. And humans evolved from apelike ancestors whether they did so by Darwin’s proposed mechanism or by some other, yet to be discovered.

You can read more about Christine O’Donnell’s frightening views on science at Southern Fried Science.

NEW SPECIES of snailfish discovered in one of the world’s deepest ocean trenches

Scientists observe a new species of snailfish living at 7000 meters (or about 23,000 feet) below the ocean surface in a deep ocean trench. According to one scientist, “The immense isolation of each trench draws parallels with island evolution theory popularised by Darwin’s finches.” More via Physorg.com:

These latest discoveries provide a new insight into the depths at which fish survive and the diversity of populations which could exist in the deepest points of oceans across the globe.

Dr Alan Jamieson from the University of Aberdeen’s Oceanlab, who led the expedition said: “Our findings, which revealed diverse and abundant species at depths previously thought to be void of fish, will prompt a rethink into marine populations at extreme depths.

“This expedition was prompted by our findings in 2008 and 2009 off Japan and New Zealand where we discovered new species of snailfish known as Liparids – inhabiting trenches off Japan and New Zealand at depths of approximately 7000m — with each trench hosting its own unique species of the fish.

“To test whether these species would be found in all trenches, we repeated our experiments on the other side of the Pacific Ocean off Peru and Chile, some 6000 miles from our last observations.

“What we found was that indeed there was another unique species of snailfish living at 7000m — entirely new to science, which had never been caught or seen before.