CONSUMERISM: The Story of Stuff with Annie Leonard

Very recommended video (in case you haven’t seen it or need a refresher):

What is the Story of Stuff?

From its extraction through sale, use and disposal, all the stuff in our lives affects communities at home and abroad, yet most of this is hidden from view. The Story of Stuff is a 20-minute, fast-paced, fact-filled look at the underside of our production and consumption patterns. The Story of Stuff exposes the connections between a huge number of environmental and social issues, and calls us together to create a more sustainable and just world. It’ll teach you something, it’ll make you laugh, and it just may change the way you look at all the stuff in your life forever.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

COMMODIFICATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES: Mother Nature doesn’t do bailouts

trash-mountainMost folks don’t grasp or understand that we humans live in a limited world (or truly comprehend that our goods and services, electricity, air, and water depend on natural processes and natural resources—many of which are nonrenewable, meaning gone forever).

We should be teaching our children the responsibilities of living in a limited world and the consequences of over consumption.

Environmentalism and conservation are very important concepts, and as environmental degradation increases, these movements or ideas will continue to grow stronger. From the New York Times:

“We created a way of raising standards of living that we can’t possibly pass on to our children,” said Joe Romm, a physicist and climate expert who writes the indispensable blog climateprogress.org. We have been getting rich by depleting all our natural stocks — water, hydrocarbons, forests, rivers, fish and arable land — and not by generating renewable flows.

.       .       .

Over a billion people today suffer from water scarcity; deforestation in the tropics destroys an area the size of Greece every year — more than 25 million acres; more than half of the world’s fisheries are over-fished or fished at their limit.

“Just as a few lonely economists warned us we were living beyond our financial means and overdrawing our financial assets, scientists are warning us that we’re living beyond our ecological means and overdrawing our natural assets,” argues Glenn Prickett, senior vice president at Conservation International. But, he cautioned, as environmentalists have pointed out: “Mother Nature doesn’t do bailouts.”

.       .       .

For starters, economies need to transition to the concept of net-zero, whereby buildings, cars, factories and homes are designed not only to generate as much energy as they use but to be infinitely recyclable in as many parts as possible. Let’s grow by creating flows rather than plundering more stocks.

Gilding says he’s actually an optimist. So am I. People are already using this economic slowdown to retool and reorient economies. Germany, Britain, China and the U.S. have all used stimulus bills to make huge new investments in clean power. South Korea’s new national paradigm for development is called: “Low carbon, green growth.” Who knew? People are realizing we need more than incremental changes — and we’re seeing the first stirrings of growth in smarter, more efficient, more responsible ways.


Photo source for attribution. The author or licensor of this image does not endorse my work or me and their image is protected under an attribution license.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

RIDICULOUS & WASTEFUL PRODUCT AWARD

I see absolutely no utility in oxygen in a can or oxygen bars, except to make money off ridiculous and wasteful consumers. From Scientific American:

So why would treating injuries with a molecule that fuels life actually do the reverse? Evidence suggests that pumping in too much oxygen too quickly can strip the molecule of a single electron, creating a free radical. Free radicals, linked to rapid aging, are highly reactive with other molecules, including vital DNA and proteins, the destruction of which can damage or kill cells.

Treating with too much oxygen, therefore, could increase the production of free radicals and make a bad situation even worse. The key is to find that “sweet spot,” Becker says—the optimal amount to give a person so he or she can recover with minimal damage.

oxygen-in-a-can
From the FDA Consumer:

The American Lung Association says that inhaling oxygen at oxygen bars is unlikely to have a beneficial physiological effect, but adds “there is no evidence that oxygen at the low flow levels used in bars can be dangerous to a normal person’s health.”

People with certain medical conditions are another matter. Some need supplemental oxygen, but should not go to oxygen bars, says Purucker. People with some types of heart disease, asthma, congestive heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases, such as emphysema, need to have their medical oxygen regulated carefully to oxygenate their blood properly, says Purucker. “If they inhale too much oxygen, they can stop breathing.”

People who have received bleomycin, a chemotherapy used to treat some types of cancer, are in danger if they are exposed to high levels of oxygen for too long, adds Purucker. “People think oxygen is good, but more is not necessarily better.”

One of the FDA’s biggest concerns about oxygen bars is the use of “flavored” oxygen, says Purucker. The flavor is produced by bubbling oxygen through bottles containing aromatic solutions and then pumping the vaporized scent through the hose and into the nostrils. Some bars use oil-free, food-grade particles to produce the aroma, but others may use aroma oils. Inhaling oily substances can lead to a serious inflammation of the lungs, known as lipoid pneumonia. Even if an oil-free medium is used, the purity or sterility of the aerosol that is generated cannot be guaranteed. Susceptible customers run the risk of inhaling allergens or irritants that may cause them to wheeze. Inhalation of live contaminants such as bacteria or other pathogens may lead to infection.

oxygen-in-a-can2


Photo source for attribution here and here. The authors or licensors of these images do not endorse my work or me and their images are protected under an attribution license.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

QUOTE

In a way, can the run amuck free market system and American consumption be applied to the tragedy of the commons?  Nonetheless, I believe this is an important quote from Garrett Hardin in his The Tragedy of the Commons:

Therein is the tragedy. Each man is locked into a system that compels him to increase his herd without limit in a world that is limited. Ruin is the destination toward which all men rush, each pursuing his own best interest in a society that believes in the freedom of the commons. Freedom in a commons brings ruin to all….

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

TINSTAAFL: There is no such thing as a free lunch

Peter Schiff understands the consequences of unsustainable consumption and reliance on an unsustainable economy. The other pundits on CNBC’s Fast Money arguing with Schiff don’t seem to understand the consequences of unsustainable economics, the consequences of investing real assets into imaginary assets, or the consequences of the second law of thermodynamics and increasing entropy within a closed system. One guy argues that the economy can evolve beyond reliance on bricks and mortar, but we will always need bricks and mortar from nature in order to produce our goods. As a result, we should use these bricks and mortar wisely; otherwise, they become too expensive and the economy suffers. Furthermore, Americans have become so habituated to consuming cheap goods that we’ve become ignorant to the fact that there is no such thing as a free lunch. Ultimately, we must get back to saving.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook