WATER AVAILABILITY: Coal, natural gas, and nuclear industry major consumers of water

nuclear-energyClean energy sources like solar and wind use hardly no water—”except during the manufacturing process.”  As a result, if carbon dioxide will not “become the make-or-break issue for new forms of power generation,” then water might, since power plants need access to large amounts of water.

For example, the Achilles heel of nuclear energy isn’t merely the buildup of radioactive waste but drought. Recent drought conditions in the southeast seriously threatened nuclear reactors to “throttle back or temporarily shut down . . . since drought [was] drying up the rivers and lakes that supply power plants with the awesome amounts of cooling water they need to operate,” and “during Europe’s brutal 2006 heat wave, French, Spanish and German utilities were forced to shut down some of their nuclear plants and reduce power at others because of low water levels – some for as much as a week.” Because of the drought, utilities in the southeast were considering to purchase replacement energy on the wholesale market. However, replacement energy on the wholesale market during the summer would have cost these utilities “10 times” what nuclear energy normally costs. From the Wall Street Journal blog “Environmental Capital”:

The water issue affects all kinds of power generation—coal, natural gas, and nuclear power; the nuclear industry’s water appetite in particular has become a flashpoint for criticism. The U.S. Geological Survey figures power plants are the second-biggest users of water in the U.S., behind agriculture.

The irony is that efforts to fight climate change could make the situation even worse: TheNational Energy Technology Laboratory estimates that “clean coal” plants that capture and store carbon emissions would make the power sector an even bigger consumer of water if the still-to-be-developed plants are widely deployed in coming decades. That’s because it takes more energy and water to capture and store the emissions than it does at a regular coal plant.

As the article notes–with the exception of solar thermal power which uses the sun to heat up water in huge pipes–clean energy’s low water needs provide another selling point. Neither technology uses much water at all, except during the manufacturing process.

That could explain why Vestas, the world’s biggest maker of wind turbines, subtly changed its sales pitch in recent months. Now, the company touts wind power’s miserly use of water first, and its low-carbon electricity generation second.


Photo source for attribution. The author or licensor of this image does not endorse my work or me and their image is protected under an attribution license.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

SMART GRID explained

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

OBAMA’S ENERGY PLAN: Smart conservation

Obama’s energy plan is common sense, since part of his energy plan tackles the federal government. As a former federal government contractor, I noticed a lot of waste—especially how government vehicles are used. Certainly, a large portion of government travel can use either smaller, hybrid, or plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs). Furthermore, he is calling for conservation, and there is nothing wrong with conservation if it promotes reasonable consumption.

An energy plan using electric, hybrid, and PHEVs is far superior to T. Boone Pickens’s plan to put a lot of energy and money to develop the infrastructure for natural gas-powered vehicles. Natural gas is another fossil fuel, but it produces less energy. Personally, I don’t believe we need new coal power plants, and clean coal doesn’t exist. Other highlights of Obama’s energy plan include: (1) developing America’s renewable energy infrastructure thus (2) create green jobs, (3) using cap-and-trade programs to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and (4) eliminate or reduce our energy imports. Obama also wants to promote energy conservation and efficiency by updating our current electrical grid to smart grid technology. From MarketWatch:

According to President-elect Obama’s website (www.barackobama.com), the Obama-Biden plan aims to “make the U.S. a leader on climate change” and to “put 1 million Plug-In Hybrid cars — cars that can get up to 150 miles per gallon — on the road by 2015.” Other goals of the Obama-Biden plan include:

– Invest $150 billion over 10 years to accelerate the commercialization of plug-in hybrids (PHEVs), commercial scale renewable energy, low emissions coal plants, the next generation of fuel infrastructure and the transition to a new digital electricity grid

– Convert the entire White House fleet to plug-ins within Obama’s first year of office

– Ensure that half of all cars purchased by the federal government be PHEVs or EVs by 2012

– Provide a $7,000 tax credit for the purchase of advanced technology vehicles as well as conversion tax credits

– Require 10% of electricity to come from renewable sources by 2012

Hat tip to Kevin.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

ELECTRIC VEHICLES: Rechargeable battery trade group head talks viability, cost of hybrids and electric vehicles

E&ETV’s “OnPoint” hosts a discussion with George Kerchner who is the executive director of the Portable Rechargeable Battery Association. Mr. Kerchner discusses the need for policy development to make electric vehicles more viable and the influences that electric vehicles will have on the grid. Go here to see the video.