CLEAN COAL: Senate wants EPA to produce new coal ash regulations

The Senate is pressuring the EPA to promulgate new regulations managing coal ash. From Environment & Energy Daily:

In 2000, EPA produced a draft regulatory determination that said certain fossil fuel combustion wastes like coal ash should be regulated as a hazardous waste under RCRA, but no regulations have ever been promulgated.

Senate EPW Committee staff member Bettina Poirier said the Senate resolution is a largely symbolic gesture intended to demonstrate that EPA has the authority under RCRA to produce new coal ash regulations. “The notion of the resolution is we don’t have to have legislation for action to occur,” she explained.

While no hearings are planned for the resolution, Poirier said sponsors will attempt to gather more supporters before bringing it to a vote “to provide very public support for the action EPA takes.”

EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said last week that the agency is primarily focused on its enforcement and response to the spill and ensuring that other facilities manage their impoundments better than TVA did in Tennessee, but she said EPA will likely produce new regulations soon.

.       .       .

Earlier this week, more than 100 environmental groups sent a letter to Jackson saying federal standards are needed to govern the disposal of coal combustion waste. The groups described coal ash waste as a huge threat, noting that nearly 100 million tons of coal ash and coal combustion waste are dumped in ponds, pits and mines across the United States each year.

Related headlines:

Coal ash will be dredged from the Emory River.  From MSNBC.com:

Environmental regulators also approved the start of dredging to remove ash from the Emory River. Until now, officials have been stabilizing the ash and working on a plan, said Anda Ray, the Tennessee Valley Authority’s top environmental officer.

Some 5.4 million cubic feet of coal ash, a byproduct of burning coal to make electricity, breached an earthen retention wall at the Kingston Fossil Plant about 40 miles west of Knoxville on Dec. 22.

Residents of the Tennessee coal ash spill are worried about their health, and some are complaining of respiratory problems. From WAAYTV.com:

Tennessee and federal environmental officials are encouraged with the progress in cleaning up a massive coal ash spill, but residents worry their health is being compromised.

Paul Davis, Tennessee’s top environmental officer, told more than 200 people attending a community meeting on the spill Thursday night in Harriman that “we appreciate to the fullest extent that we can the impact of this spill on you.” He vowed “total remediation” of the 300 acres that were covered by 5.4 million cubic yards of ash near the Kingston Fossil Plant on Dec. 22.

But Rick Cantrell with a residents’ group said the community is worried about coal dust in the air and in their homes. Some are complaining of trouble breathing and other illnesses.

Not only is TVA having legal trouble from the toxic coal ash spill but also out of control credit card spending is causing problems. From the Institute of Southern Studies:

The Tennessee Valley Authority, already caught in a legal quagmire following December’s disastrous spill of a billion gallons of coal ash from its Kingston power plant, is in trouble yet again — this time for out-of-control credit card spending by its employees.

A two-year review by TVA’s Inspector General found that spending as part of a program created in 1995 for minor business-related expenses had ballooned to more than $75 million annually

Homeowners are upset with performance bonus and pay raise accepted by Tennessee Valley Authority’s CEO as electricity rates shoot up. From MSNBC.com

When electric bills across Tennessee recently shot up, homeowners and lawmakers went after the TVA’s top man, CEO Tom Kilgore, and his $1 million bonus — a paycheck that became a real turn-off to rate payers.

His nearly $2.5 million paycheck is adding to the anger of everyday people who are struggling to pay their bills.

The public was angered by October’s rate increase. At that same time, Kilgore accepted a pay raise.

The end of wet fly ash storage may be over. From the Knoxville News Sentinel:

The spill near Harriman three days before Christmas most likely spells the end for wet storage at the steam plant, according to a mandatory corrective action plan submitted Monday to the state Department of Environment and Conservation. Any such transition would be subject to state approval and would take about two years.

“TVA has committed to ceasing wet ash storage in the failed dredge cell,” according to the plan. “In order to manage future ash production, TVA is considering the installation of equipment that enables the fly ash from Kingston to be collected dry. Collecting fly ash on a dry basis will allow for more flexible marketing and disposal options and reduce the size of pond structures. … If the decision is made to convert to dry collection, the time from project start to completion is expected to take 18-24 months.”

The spill has raised questions across the state and around the nation about the safety of coal ash and how to store it.

State Sen. Tim Burchett, R-Knoxville, introduced a bill Tuesday that would ban wet storage of fly ash.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

BUSH ADMINISTRATION employs 11th hour attacks on environmental regulation

bush-on-the-environment

Via OH, FOR THE LOVE OF SCIENCE!.

On the Net:

  1. EPA moves to relax clean air rules near national parks
  2. Bush angers environmentalists with last-minute rule changes
  3. From ProPublica:

    Here is a rundown of rules and regulations that the Bush administration is pushing through the rulemaking process in its waning days. We will update the list regularly by adding new rules, inserting links to breaking news on each rule, and tracking each rule through the rulemaking process. If you know of other rules we should add to this list, please send us an email here. You can use our tip-sheet to get started on your rules research.

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. speculated for EPA chief position

robert-f-kennedy-jr-vanity-fairIt appears that Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is a strong candidate for Obama’s EPA chief, but is Robert F. Kennedy Jr. too controversial to be the head administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)? Personally, I believe his experience as an environmental lawyer, passion to protect the environment, and life long intent to protect the environment are needed in a government entity that is viewed as being too politicized, pro-industry, and viewed overall as not a protector of the environment. However, my greatest criticism of Kennedy is his position on Cape Wind.

Kennedy’s viewpoint on Cape Wind has been widely criticized, and many environmental groups do support Cape Wind. Kennedy argues that the area proposed for Cape Wind is a wilderness comparable to Yosemite National Park, but it isn’t. Although Yosemite receives a lot of human traffic, anthropogenic influence is probably much greater in Nantucket Sound than Yosemite (arguably, wilderness doesn’t exist anywhere anymore).

It would be interesting to see the other names on Obama’s shortlist for head of the EPA, but Kennedy said if picked, he will serve.

On the Net:

  1. Transition talk: Wild rumors: A roundup of possible Cabinet picks for environment-related positions
  2. Transition Talk: Barack Obama: Meet the people who might fill top environmental jobs in an Obama administration

Image Found Here

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT: The Bush Administration’s last minute push to deregulate spreads beyond the Endangered Species Act

Who needs regulation—especially environmental regulation, it’s just too inconvenient for some folks. From the Washington Post:

The White House is working to enact a wide array of federal regulations, many of which would weaken government rules aimed at protecting consumers and the environment, before President Bush leaves office in January.

The new rules would be among the most controversial deregulatory steps of the Bush era and could be difficult for his successor to undo. Some would ease or lift constraints on private industry, including power plants, mines and farms.

Those and other regulations would help clear obstacles to some commercial ocean-fishing activities, ease controls on emissions of pollutants that contribute to global warming, relax drinking-water standards and lift a key restriction on mountaintop coal mining.

.       .       .

A rule put forward by the National Marine Fisheries Service and now under final review by the OMB would lift a requirement that environmental impact statements be prepared for certain fisheries-management decisions and would give review authority to regional councils dominated by commercial and recreational fishing interests.

An Alaska commercial fishing source, granted anonymity so he could speak candidly about private conversations, said that senior administration officials promised to “get the rule done by the end of this month” and that the outcome would be a big improvement.

Lee Crockett of the Pew Charitable Trusts’ Environment Group said the administration has received 194,000 public comments on the rule and protests from 80 members of Congress as well as 160 conservation groups. “This thing is fatally flawed” as well as “wildly unpopular,” Crockett said.

Two other rules nearing completion would ease limits on pollution from power plants, a major energy industry goal for the past eight years that is strenuously opposed by Democratic lawmakers and environmental groups.

One rule, being pursued over some opposition within the Environmental Protection Agency, would allow current emissions at a power plant to match the highest levels produced by that plant, overturning a rule that more strictly limits such emission increases. According to the EPA’s estimate, it would allow millions of tons of additional carbon dioxide into the atmosphere annually, worsening global warming.

A related regulation would ease limits on emissions from coal-fired power plants near national parks.

A third rule would allow increased emissions from oil refineries, chemical factories and other industrial plants with complex manufacturing operations.

These rules “will force Americans to choke on dirtier air for years to come, unless Congress or the new administration reverses these eleventh-hour abuses,” said lawyer John Walke of the Natural Resources Defense Council.

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY’S troubled waters

The Clean Water Act is under assault because there is an absence of monitoring and regulation by the EPA on chemicals that continue to go unregulated. These chemicals are permitted to flow into America’s waterways. Intersex fish are being documented across the nation. Certainly, these fish are an important indicator to our own health. Because of its management, the EPA is inefficient and broke. The agency is incompetent and a waste under the Bush Administration. The Bush Administration has set precedent to abuse and ignore the law. It will be interesting to see how the next administration repairs these problems.