<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Conservation Report &#187; Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://conservationreport.com/tag/exxon-shipping-co-v-baker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://conservationreport.com</link>
	<description>Tracking news regarding conservation, the environment, energy, politics, and technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 19:31:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
<cloud domain='conservationreport.com' port='80' path='/?rsscloud=notify' registerProcedure='' protocol='http-post' />

	<atom:link rel="search" type="application/opensearchdescription+xml" href="http://conservationreport.com/osd.xml" title="The Conservation Report" />
	<atom:link rel='hub' href='http://conservationreport.com/?pushpress=hub'/>
		<item>
		<title>EXXON VALDEZ: 20 years later, Exxon Valdez oil spill disaster still polluting Alaska</title>
		<link>http://conservationreport.com/2008/11/12/js-mcdougall-the-oil-still-polluting-alaska-20-years-after-exxon-valdez-video/</link>
		<comments>http://conservationreport.com/2008/11/12/js-mcdougall-the-oil-still-polluting-alaska-20-years-after-exxon-valdez-video/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 20:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Buck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Environmental Disaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fisheries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pollution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon Mobil Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon Valdez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon Valdez Oil Spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Cleanup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon Valdez Tanker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ExxonMobil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fuel Spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil Spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William Sound]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recommended YouTube]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Single-Hull Oil Tankers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservationreport.com/2008/11/12/js-mcdougall-the-oil-still-polluting-alaska-20-years-after-exxon-valdez-video/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[:: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: Posted in Environment, Environmental Disaster, Fisheries, Pollution, Video Tagged: Big Oil, Exxon, Exxon Mobil Corporation, Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker, Exxon Valdez, Exxon Valdez Oil Spill, Exxon Valdez Oil &#8230; <a href="http://conservationreport.com/2008/11/12/js-mcdougall-the-oil-still-polluting-alaska-20-years-after-exxon-valdez-video/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=conservationreport.com&amp;blog=2546216&amp;post=3969&amp;subd=conservationreport&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://conservationreport.com/2008/11/12/js-mcdougall-the-oil-still-polluting-alaska-20-years-after-exxon-valdez-video/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/79a9ed9e0a87ce259e91d0ab9c490325?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Buck Denton</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://conservationreport.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/delicious.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">20 years later, Exxon Valdez oil spill disaster still polluting Alaska</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://conservationreport.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/blinklist.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">20 years later, Exxon Valdez oil spill disaster still polluting Alaska</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://conservationreport.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/furl.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">20 years later, Exxon Valdez oil spill disaster still polluting Alaska</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://conservationreport.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/digg.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">20 years later, Exxon Valdez oil spill disaster still polluting Alaska</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://conservationreport.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/magnolia.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">20 years later, Exxon Valdez oil spill disaster still polluting Alaska</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://conservationreport.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/stumbleit.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">20 years later, Exxon Valdez oil spill disaster still polluting Alaska</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://conservationreport.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/simpy.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">20 years later, Exxon Valdez oil spill disaster still polluting Alaska</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://conservationreport.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/newsvine.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">20 years later, Exxon Valdez oil spill disaster still polluting Alaska</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://conservationreport.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/reddit.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">20 years later, Exxon Valdez oil spill disaster still polluting Alaska</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://conservationreport.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/fark.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">20 years later, Exxon Valdez oil spill disaster still polluting Alaska</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://conservationreport.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/tailrank.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">TailRank</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://conservationreport.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/facebookcom.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">20 years later, Exxon Valdez oil spill disaster still polluting Alaska</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>BIG OIL: &#8220;Fisherma&#8217;am&#8221; Proposes 28th Amendment: Separation Of Corporation And State</title>
		<link>http://conservationreport.com/2008/11/11/fishermaam-proposes-28th-amendment-separation-of-corporation-and-state/</link>
		<comments>http://conservationreport.com/2008/11/11/fishermaam-proposes-28th-amendment-separation-of-corporation-and-state/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Buck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[28th Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dr. Riki Ott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon Mobil Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon Valdez]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon Valdez Oil Spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Cleanup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon Valdez Oil Spill Effects]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fisherma'am]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Not One Drop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Separation Of Church And State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Separation Of Corporation And State]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservationreport.com/2008/11/11/fishermaam-proposes-28th-amendment-separation-of-corporation-and-state/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[more about &#8220;&#8220;Fisherma&#8217;am&#8221; Proposes 28th Amendment&#8230;&#8220;, posted with vodpod More information regarding this video can be found at The Huffington Post. :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: :: Posted in Law, Politics Tagged: 28th Amendment, Big &#8230; <a href="http://conservationreport.com/2008/11/11/fishermaam-proposes-28th-amendment-separation-of-corporation-and-state/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=conservationreport.com&amp;blog=2546216&amp;post=3906&amp;subd=conservationreport&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://conservationreport.com/2008/11/11/fishermaam-proposes-28th-amendment-separation-of-corporation-and-state/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/79a9ed9e0a87ce259e91d0ab9c490325?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Buck Denton</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://conservationreport.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/delicious.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Separation Of Corporation And State</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://conservationreport.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/blinklist.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Separation Of Corporation And State</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://conservationreport.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/furl.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Separation Of Corporation And State</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://conservationreport.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/digg.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Separation Of Corporation And State</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://conservationreport.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/magnolia.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Separation Of Corporation And State</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://conservationreport.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/stumbleit.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Separation Of Corporation And State</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://conservationreport.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/simpy.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Separation Of Corporation And State</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://conservationreport.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/newsvine.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Separation Of Corporation And State</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://conservationreport.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/reddit.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Separation Of Corporation And State</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://conservationreport.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/fark.png" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Separation Of Corporation And State</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://conservationreport.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/tailrank.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">TailRank</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://conservationreport.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/facebookcom.gif" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Separation Of Corporation And State</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>SARAH PALIN should know other Supreme Court decisions besides Roe v. Wade</title>
		<link>http://conservationreport.com/2008/10/01/sarah-palin-cant-name-another-supreme-court-decision-she-disagrees-with/</link>
		<comments>http://conservationreport.com/2008/10/01/sarah-palin-cant-name-another-supreme-court-decision-she-disagrees-with/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 01:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Buck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Roe v. Wade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court of the United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservationreport.wordpress.com/?p=2475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although Sarah Palin had disagreed with the United States Supreme Court&#8217;s decision in Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker before, she recently could not give Katie Couric the name of a Supreme Court decision other than Roe v. Wade that she &#8230; <a href="http://conservationreport.com/2008/10/01/sarah-palin-cant-name-another-supreme-court-decision-she-disagrees-with/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=conservationreport.com&amp;blog=2546216&amp;post=2475&amp;subd=conservationreport&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://conservationreport.com/2008/10/01/sarah-palin-cant-name-another-supreme-court-decision-she-disagrees-with/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/79a9ed9e0a87ce259e91d0ab9c490325?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Buck Denton</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>EXXON SHIPPING CO. V. BAKER: Sarah Palin was critical of Supreme Court&#8217;s Exxon decision</title>
		<link>http://conservationreport.com/2008/09/05/exxon-shipping-co-v-baker-sarah-palin-was-critical-of-supreme-courts-exxon-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://conservationreport.com/2008/09/05/exxon-shipping-co-v-baker-sarah-palin-was-critical-of-supreme-courts-exxon-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 18:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Buck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[2008 Republican National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonrenewable Resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Republican National Convention]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Palin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservationreport.wordpress.com/?p=1849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tony Mauro at The Blog of Legal Times (BLT) notes that according to Stanford Law School professor and Davis Wright Tremaine partner Jeffrey Fisher, Sarah Palin and her husband could have but did not join the class action lawsuit that &#8230; <a href="http://conservationreport.com/2008/09/05/exxon-shipping-co-v-baker-sarah-palin-was-critical-of-supreme-courts-exxon-decision/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=conservationreport.com&amp;blog=2546216&amp;post=1849&amp;subd=conservationreport&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://conservationreport.com/2008/09/05/exxon-shipping-co-v-baker-sarah-palin-was-critical-of-supreme-courts-exxon-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/79a9ed9e0a87ce259e91d0ab9c490325?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Buck Denton</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>BIG OIL: Exxon Mobil $11,700,000,000.00 (billion) 2Q profit sets US record</title>
		<link>http://conservationreport.com/2008/07/31/big-oil-exxon-mobil-1168-billion-2q-profit-sets-us-record/</link>
		<comments>http://conservationreport.com/2008/07/31/big-oil-exxon-mobil-1168-billion-2q-profit-sets-us-record/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:01:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Buck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Big Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Energy Mix of the Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonrenewable Resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Renewable Resources]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservationreport.wordpress.com/?p=1218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And to think Exxon didn’t even want to pay any damages in Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker. I wonder how Exxon Mobil will spend their $11.68 billion 2Q profits. Will the oil giant use its profits to aggressively develop alternative &#8230; <a href="http://conservationreport.com/2008/07/31/big-oil-exxon-mobil-1168-billion-2q-profit-sets-us-record/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=conservationreport.com&amp;blog=2546216&amp;post=1218&amp;subd=conservationreport&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://conservationreport.com/2008/07/31/big-oil-exxon-mobil-1168-billion-2q-profit-sets-us-record/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/79a9ed9e0a87ce259e91d0ab9c490325?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Buck Denton</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://conservationreport.files.wordpress.com/2008/07/bling-bling.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>OIL: John Stossel calls oil companies heroic</title>
		<link>http://conservationreport.com/2008/07/10/oil-john-stossel-calls-oil-companies-heroic/</link>
		<comments>http://conservationreport.com/2008/07/10/oil-john-stossel-calls-oil-companies-heroic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 04:18:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Buck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Stossel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonrenewable Resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservationreport.wordpress.com/?p=795</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would not exactly lump oil companies with heroes. It&#8217;s not like oil companies are delivering their product at a reduced price or at no cost where it would be detrimental or risky to their well being. For example, Exxon &#8230; <a href="http://conservationreport.com/2008/07/10/oil-john-stossel-calls-oil-companies-heroic/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=conservationreport.com&amp;blog=2546216&amp;post=795&amp;subd=conservationreport&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://conservationreport.com/2008/07/10/oil-john-stossel-calls-oil-companies-heroic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/79a9ed9e0a87ce259e91d0ab9c490325?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Buck Denton</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>EXXON SHIPPING CO. v. BAKER: Supreme Court did not apply a constitutional standard in Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker</title>
		<link>http://conservationreport.com/2008/06/26/exxon-shipping-co-v-baker-supreme-court-did-not-apply-a-constitutional-standard-in-exxon-shipping-co-v-baker/</link>
		<comments>http://conservationreport.com/2008/06/26/exxon-shipping-co-v-baker-supreme-court-did-not-apply-a-constitutional-standard-in-exxon-shipping-co-v-baker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jun 2008 04:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Buck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CR Environmental Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fuel Spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Single-Hull Oil Tankers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservationreport.wordpress.com/?p=648</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is constitutional to challenge the reasonableness of a punitive award but not a compensatory award. The goal of punitive damages is retribution or punishment and deterrence while compensatory damages are used to make a plaintiff whole or put them &#8230; <a href="http://conservationreport.com/2008/06/26/exxon-shipping-co-v-baker-supreme-court-did-not-apply-a-constitutional-standard-in-exxon-shipping-co-v-baker/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=conservationreport.com&amp;blog=2546216&amp;post=648&amp;subd=conservationreport&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://conservationreport.com/2008/06/26/exxon-shipping-co-v-baker-supreme-court-did-not-apply-a-constitutional-standard-in-exxon-shipping-co-v-baker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/79a9ed9e0a87ce259e91d0ab9c490325?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Buck Denton</media:title>
		</media:content>

		<media:content url="http://conservationreport.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/peak-oil1.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>EXXON SHIPPING CO. v. BAKER: US Supreme Court orders reduction in Exxon Valdez award</title>
		<link>http://conservationreport.com/2008/06/25/exxon-shipping-co-v-baker-us-supreme-court-orders-reduction-in-exxon-valdez-award/</link>
		<comments>http://conservationreport.com/2008/06/25/exxon-shipping-co-v-baker-us-supreme-court-orders-reduction-in-exxon-valdez-award/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Buck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CR Environmental Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fuel Spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonrenewable Resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Single-Hull Oil Tankers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservationreport.wordpress.com/?p=646</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the CNNMoney.com &#8220;[T]he punitive damages award should be brought into line with compensatory damages calculations made by lower courts earlier in the litigation.&#8221; Therefore, the award was reduced to $507.5 Million to reflect previous compensatory damages calculations. On &#8230; <a href="http://conservationreport.com/2008/06/25/exxon-shipping-co-v-baker-us-supreme-court-orders-reduction-in-exxon-valdez-award/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=conservationreport.com&amp;blog=2546216&amp;post=646&amp;subd=conservationreport&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://conservationreport.com/2008/06/25/exxon-shipping-co-v-baker-us-supreme-court-orders-reduction-in-exxon-valdez-award/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/79a9ed9e0a87ce259e91d0ab9c490325?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Buck Denton</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>EXXON SHIPPING CO. v. BAKER decision today?</title>
		<link>http://conservationreport.com/2008/06/25/exxon-shipping-co-v-baker-decision-today/</link>
		<comments>http://conservationreport.com/2008/06/25/exxon-shipping-co-v-baker-decision-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Buck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CR Environmental Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fuel Spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nonrenewable Resource]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Oil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Single-Hull Oil Tankers]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservationreport.wordpress.com/?p=645</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the Associated Press the Supreme Court is meeting this morning to decide some &#8220;major cases still unresolved [that] include the ban on handguns in Washington, D.C., whether people convicted of raping children can be given the death penalty &#8230; <a href="http://conservationreport.com/2008/06/25/exxon-shipping-co-v-baker-decision-today/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=conservationreport.com&amp;blog=2546216&amp;post=645&amp;subd=conservationreport&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://conservationreport.com/2008/06/25/exxon-shipping-co-v-baker-decision-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/79a9ed9e0a87ce259e91d0ab9c490325?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Buck Denton</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>EXXON SHIPPING CO. v. BAKER: No Exxon Valdez decision today</title>
		<link>http://conservationreport.com/2008/06/23/exxon-shipping-co-v-baker-no-exxon-valdez-decision-today/</link>
		<comments>http://conservationreport.com/2008/06/23/exxon-shipping-co-v-baker-no-exxon-valdez-decision-today/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 16:38:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Buck</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CR Environmental Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fuel Spill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Habitat Degradation Loss Fragmentation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://conservationreport.wordpress.com/?p=622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There will be no Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker (Exxon Valdez punitive damages) decision released today. The decision is eagerly awaited because it will end almost 20 years of litigation. Furthermore, the case may be pivotal in redefining the role &#8230; <a href="http://conservationreport.com/2008/06/23/exxon-shipping-co-v-baker-no-exxon-valdez-decision-today/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a><img alt="" border="0" src="http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=conservationreport.com&amp;blog=2546216&amp;post=622&amp;subd=conservationreport&amp;ref=&amp;feed=1" width="1" height="1" />]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://conservationreport.com/2008/06/23/exxon-shipping-co-v-baker-no-exxon-valdez-decision-today/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	
		<media:content url="http://1.gravatar.com/avatar/79a9ed9e0a87ce259e91d0ab9c490325?s=96&#38;d=identicon&#38;r=G" medium="image">
			<media:title type="html">Buck Denton</media:title>
		</media:content>
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
