FISHERIES: NOAA to require weak hooks to reduce the bycatch of large bluefin tuna in the Gulf of Mexico

Images: The first image shows, via the United Nations’ Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, a tuna longline. A yellowfin tuna is caught on a weak hook in the second image. Larger species are excluded, because the hooks “straighten when a large fish, such as bluefin tuna, is hooked, releasing it but holding on to smaller fish.” The image is via Mike Carde. Via NOAA, some weak hooks, at various stages of bending, are shown in the third image. The fourth image, via izik on Flickr, illustrates some longline hooks from an Alaskan fishery.


In a fishery, which can mean many things, fishers target certain species for personal consumption or for market. However, sometimes, fishers catch other species in addition to the species that they’re targeting. These non-target species are known as bycatch, and even though bycatch might be illegal to keep, to consume, to target, or to market, bycatch may still be incidentally caught in some fisheries.

Therefore, if the fisher doesn’t have a permit to keep certain species or if the species is illegal to keep, it’s simply wastefully discarded overboard. Bycatch isn’t wasted, however, if a fisheries observer is onboard to scientifically sample the species or if the fishers keep the specimen to turnover to scientists for research. As a result, bycatch can yield valuable data about a species and its interaction with commercial fishing gear.

Nonetheless, bycatch is a serious problem in some fisheries — particularly in some commercial fisheries, where the ecological footprint can be significant. Bycatch might include other species of fish, undersized or juvenile target species, marine mammals, sea turtles, sea birds, or invertebrates. Fisheries with little or no bycatch and minimal impact to the environment are often called clean fisheries. For example, “environmental seafood guides produced by Audubon and the Monterey Bay Aquarium have cited the Albacore troll fishery as an example of a clean fishery with little bycatch or impact on the environment.”

Due to being incidentally caught, some species, in particular, are at risk. For example, populations of endangered species, valuable species, or species that are easily caught as bycatch in certain fisheries suffer from illegal fishing or from fisheries that are inefficient or dirty. However, fisheries research can result in improvements that mitigate or even eliminate bycatch of certain species (thus making the fishery cleaner), so cooperative research is important in ensuring continued seafood production and in making fisheries more sustainable.

Big, fat female fish, which have a higher fecundity, and therefore are important to sustaining certain fish stocks or populations, are vulnerable as bycatch in some fisheries. The loss of important breeding individuals is devastating to certain fish stocks or to certain populations of fish species. One such fishery, which is problematic for incidentally removing important breeding individuals, is the surface-longline fishery. However, conservationists, fishery managers, and scientists are working to improve the fishery by tweaking fishing gear or utilizing bycatch reduction devices. Starting May 5, 2011, for example, “NOAA’s Fisheries Service will require commercial fishermen who fish for yellowfin tuna, swordfish and other species with longlines in the Gulf of Mexico to use a new type of hook, called a weak hook, designed to reduce the incidental catch of Atlantic bluefin tuna.” More via NOAA:

Directed fishing for bluefin tuna in the Gulf has been prohibited since the early 1980s, however bluefin are caught incidentally by longline fishermen who target other species. The Gulf of Mexico is the only known spawning area for the western stock of Atlantic bluefin tuna, a historically overfished species. Many bluefin die from the stress endured in this incidental capture in warm water even if fishermen release them.

“NOAA worked with longline fishermen from the Gulf to test the weak hook carefully over the last three years,” said Eric Schwaab, assistant NOAA administrator for NOAA’s Fisheries Service. “Our cooperative scientific research with fishermen is showing that this new technology can protect bluefin tuna in the Gulf while still allowing fishermen to target yellowfin tuna and swordfish.”

The weak hook is a circular hook constructed of thin gauge wire, and is designed to straighten when a large fish, such as bluefin tuna, is hooked, releasing it but holding on to smaller fish. The average size of bluefin tuna landed in the Gulf of Mexico longline fishery is 485 pounds, while the average for yellowfin tuna is about 86 pounds.

Yellowfin tuna and swordfish are valuable commercial fisheries in the Gulf of Mexico, supporting fishing jobs on approximately 50 vessels as well as jobs on shore. The two species bring longline fishermen annual dockside earnings of $7 million. Research showed that the weak hook could result in some reductions in target catch while some longline fishermen have reported weak hooks did not hurt their businesses.

“During our tests, we used regular hooks for half our hooks and half were the new weak hooks,” said Capt. Mike Carden, a longline fisherman from Panama City, Fla. who took part in the cooperative research. “We were so happy with the weak hooks we quit using the heavy hooks. The weak hook releases fish we don’t want to catch. Because it’s smaller and lighter, we catch more yellowfin tuna on the weak hook. There’s several of us who have gone to the weak hook.”

And from Dot Earth:

Federal fisheries officials, after field studies and public debate, have issued a new rule requiring commercial fishing boats deploying long lines of fish hooks in the Gulf of Mexico to use “weak hooks” that hold smaller, abundant species like yellowfin tuna but, in theory, will allow  depleted Atlantic bluefin tuna and other rare large species to escape. Here’s background in a news release from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

.       .       .

The agency release included a supporting comment from a captain of one of the 50 or so commercial longline vessels in the fishery:

“During our tests, we used regular hooks for half our hooks and half were the new weak hooks,” said Capt. Mike Carden, a longline fisherman from Panama City, Fla., who took part in the cooperative research. “We were so happy with the weak hooks we quit using the heavy hooks. The weak hook releases fish we don’t want to catch. Because it’s smaller and lighter, we catch more yellowfin tuna on the weak hook. There’s several of us who have gone to the weak hook.”

The Pew Environmental Trusts, which has been tracking the issue closely, gave a very mixed review to the move. Here’s a statement e-mailed to me by Dave Bard, a spokesman, followed by a video the group has produced on bluefin and the gulf:

Pew is pleased that the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) has recognized the major bycatch problem with bluefin tuna in the Gulf of Mexico, the fish’s only known spawning area in the western Atlantic Ocean. The agency has issued a short-term solution requiring the use of “weak” hooks starting May 5, 2011. Pew is also pleased that NMFS has left the door open to consider long-term solutions including time and area closures. But, a year-round prohibition on surface longlines is the only way to provide effective long-term protection for bluefin tuna and other rare and beautiful species in the Gulf. This prohibition would still allow fishermen in the Gulf to catch swordfish and yellowfin tuna; they would just be required to use more selective alternatives to wasteful surface longlines.

Here’s the video report:

You can continue reading more about this story at Dot Earth.

Online Resources:

  1. New Fishing Hooks Protect Bluefin Tuna in Gulf of Mexico But Allow Catch of Yellowfin Tuna and Swordfish
  2. Longline Gear Innovation
  3. Industrial Tuna Longlining
  4. WWF’s International Smart Gear Competition
  5. Stop Surface Longlining in the Gulf of Mexico
  6. Northeast Cooperative Fisheries Research
  7. Seafood Watch Program: A Consumer’s Guide to Sustainable Seafood

OCEANS: Harp seals on thin ice

I think that the bigger problem for harp seals is the loss of sea ice due to global warming.

- Brian Skerry

In this TED talk, National Geographic photojournalist Brian Skerry illustrates, with his underwater photography, the ocean’s natural glory, but he also shows the horror that anthropogenic activities have brought onto oceans around the world. For example, the true unseen costs of a shrimp dinner might be hundreds of pounds of bycatch, which are animals and plants that are caught with the targeted species, by fishermen, but these animals and plants have no commercial value. Bycatch is are often killed during the fishing process and thrown back into the sea as trash.

One of Brian Skerry’s most celebrated underwater images is this diver with a Southern right whale. You can see more of Brian Skerry’s right whale images in National Geographic Magazine’s October issue or here and here.

Via

On the Net:

  1. Brian Skerry – Underwater Photographer

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

NEW SPECIES of orcas proposed

Killer whales, like bottlenose dolphins, are currently divided into ecotypes. For example, there are offshore, resident, and transient orcas, which exhibit different behavior and feeding habits. The offshore ecotype “are genetically different from their kin, the marine mammal-eating transient killer whales and fish-eating resident killer whales.” Recent research shows that these ecotypes and other orca groups from around the world represent distinct species and possibly up to two distinct subspecies. More via GenomeWeb Daily News:

Killer whale “ecotypes,” which vary in their choice of prey, behavior, and appearance, represent distinct species, according to a paper appearing online yesterday in Genome Research.

An international research team including researchers from Roche’s 454 Life Sciences and Roche Applied Sciences, used highly parallel pyrosequencing to assess the complete mitochondrial genomes of nearly 150 killer whales from the North Atlantic, North Pacific, and southern oceans. In so doing, they identified dozens of mitochondrial haplotypes that point to the existence of at least three killer whale species.

“We recommend that three named ecotypes be elevated to full species, and that two additional types be recognized as subspecies pending additional data,” lead author Phillip Morin, a geneticist affiliated with the National Marine Fisheries Service’s Southwest Fisheries Science Center and the University of California at San Diego’s Scripps Institution of Oceanography, and colleagues wrote.

Killer whales are currently classified as just one species, Orcinus orca. Nevertheless, researchers have identified several so-called killer whale ecotypes that have slightly different size and color patterns, behaviors, prey preferences, and social organizations.

More via NOAA:

“Offshore killer whales differ in size, shape and behavior from other two killer whales eco-types,” said Marilyn Dahlheim, a researcher from the Alaska Fisheries Science Center. Offshore killer whales are shyer, moving evasively and unpredictably when approach by boats, she explained. They are smaller and they tend to live in larger groups—up to 75 or 100 individuals.

Although the ranges of the three eco-types occasionally overlap, offshore killer whales have never been seen to intermix with resident or transient killer whales.

Offshore killer whales most likely subsist on fish. They have, for instance, been seen with salmon in their mouths. Scientists have observed many other foraging behaviors which also support the idea that they are fish-eaters. Scientists have watched offshore killer whales in the company of sea lions, gray whales, fin whales and dolphins. In no case did the offshore killer whales target these animals as prey, nor did the other marine mammals act as if the offshore killer whales were a predatory threat.


Photo source for attribution. The author or licensor of this image does not endorse my work or me and their image is protected under an attribution license.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

VIDEO: Explorers census thousands of unique ocean species between edge of darkness and black abyss

More via PhysOrg.com

On the Net:

  1. Census of Marine Life
  2. WEIRD AND FASCINATING CREATURES: 10 extraordinary deep-sea creatures caught on video and camera

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

MARINE CONSERVATION: Glenn Beck attacks sea turtle conservation

Kemp's RidleyKemp's Ridley3Kemp's Ridley2In the video above, Glenn Beck goes crazy over sea turtle and sea otter conservation. Most certainly, Glenn Beck channels Republican contempt for conservation, environmentalism, environmental regulations, and science. However, there is a great utility in preserving nature and natural landscapes. We all benefit from clean air and water in addition to the preservation of biodiversity—even Glenn Beck.

Furthermore, international sea turtle conservation work in countries such as Mexico is important, because sea turtles do not follow political boundaries. As a result, conservation efforts and gains in the United States are threatened by the lack of environmental regulation, protections, and conservation efforts in other countries.

The Kemp’s Ridley sea turtle (Lepidochelys kempii) is a critically endangered species, and “the recent nesting increase can be attributed to full protection of nesting females and their nests in Mexico, and the requirement to use turtle excluder devices in shrimp trawls both in the United States and Mexico.” More from the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service:

In 1966, conservation efforts for the Kemp’s ridley were initiated on the beach near Rancho Nuevo in Tamaulipas, Mexico. This locale is the only place in the world where large nesting aggregations of this sea turtle were and are known to occur. From 1966 to 1987, conservation efforts focused on the area of Rancho Nuevo with one turtle protection camp. In 1978, the U.S. joined with Mexico at Rancho Nuevo in a bi-national effort to prevent the extinction of the Kemp’s ridley. In 1988, this bi-national program expanded to the south and another camp was added. In 1989, a third camp was established when the program was expanded to the north of Rancho Nuevo. By 1997, a total of seven camps had been established along the Tamaulipas and Veracruz coasts to allow for increased nest protection efforts.

The Mexico government also prohibits harvesting and is working to increase the population through more intensive law enforcement, by fencing nest areas to diminish natural predation, and by relocating all nests into corrals to prevent poaching and predation. While relocation of nests into corrals is currently a necessary management measure, this relocation and concentration of eggs into a “safe” area is of concern since it makes the eggs more susceptible to reduced viability due to movement-induced mortality, disease vectors, catastrophic events like hurricanes, and marine predators once the predators learn where to concentrate their efforts.


Photo source for attribution here, here, and here. The authors or licensors of these images do not endorse my work or me and their images are protected under an attribution license.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook