OCEAN ACIDIFICATION S.O.S

Image by Lou Dematteis/Spectral Q/Handout via The Huffington Post
Acid Oceans SOS

The ocean is a natural carbon sink: In addition to biotic carbon sequestration, the ocean naturally absorbs CO2. Consequently, when we burn fossil fuels, we release carbon that has been trapped for millions of years, and this excess carbon enters the Earth’s carbon cycle.

This anthropogenically-released excess carbon is what causes ocean acidification, and the oceans have become increasingly more acidic since the industrial revolution. More on this from Physorg.com:

The chemistry is very straight-forward: ocean acidification is linearly related to the amount of CO2 we produce. CO2 dissolves in the ocean, reacts with seawater and decreases the pH. Since the industrial revolution, the oceans have become 30 percent more acidic (from 8.2 pH to 8.1 pH). “Under a “business as usual scenario, predictions for the end of the century are that we will lower the surface ocean pH by 0.4 pH units, which means that the surface oceans will become 150 percent more acidic – and this is a ‘hell of a lot’ “, said Jelle Bijma, chair of the EuroCLIMATE programme Scientific Committee and a biogeochemist at the Alfred-Wegener-Institute Bremerhaven.

Obviously, the impacts on calcifying organisms are worrying, because as oceans become more acidic, there is a “reduction in availability of the calcium carbonate needed for calcified shells and plates.” Examples of calcifying organisms include bivalves, corals, and some plankton. Since calcifying organisms are important in maintaining ocean ecosystems, various stakeholders are concerned about the impacts of ocean acidification. The negative impacts on calcifying organisms have fishers worried about their livelihoods and recreational users of oceans, such as kayakers, are concerned about aesthetic impacts. As a result, to raise awareness, these stakeholders literally spelled out an S.O.S. on ocean acidification. More from Alaskajournal.com:

Commercial fishermen, recreational boaters and kayakers took to the waters of Kachemak Bay in Homer during the Labor Day weekend to spell out an SOS on ocean acidification and to ask the world’s help in saving ocean ecosystems.

Under warm and sunny skies, interspersed at times by fog, more than 100 fishing boats, sail boats, skiffs and kayaks positioned themselves on the bay to spell out “Ocean Acid SOS.”

.       .       .

“A lot of people have heard about climate change,” said Bob Shavelson, executive director of Cook Inlet Keeper, a nonprofit group dedicated to protecting the Cook Inlet watershed. “Few have heard about ocean acidification.”

Ocean acidification is caused by the excess carbon dioxide that has been released into the atmosphere since the industrial revolution, said Jeremy Mathis, a chemical oceanographer with the University of Alaska Fairbanks. The more the carbon dioxide is absorbed into the ocean, the more acidic the ocean becomes.

Mathis is one of a growing number of scientists speaking out on the dangers of ocean acidification to the ocean ecosystems. Research results released Aug. 11 by Mathis indicated that Alaska’s oceans are becoming increasingly acidic, and that could damage Alaska’s king crab and salmon fisheries. The results also matched his recent findings in the Chukchi and Bering seas.

Northern coastal oceans, such as those off Alaska, may be becoming more acidic than other oceans, and at a faster rate. Mathis said that the cold waters and broad, shallow continental shelves around Alaska’s coast could be accelerating the process of ocean acidification in the North.

Frigid waters can absorb more carbon dioxide, he said. The shallow waters of Alaska’s continental shelves also retain more carbon dioxide because there is less mixing of seawater from deeper ocean waters.

More on ocean acidification from NOAA:

The global oceans are the largest natural reservoir for carbon dioxide, and absorb approximately 30-50% of global anthropogenic CO2 emissions. In the future, increased CO2 uptake by the oceans is expected to reduce surface ocean pH by 0.3-0.5 units over the next century (Feely et al., 2004).

As carbon dioxide (CO2) reacts with seawater, fundamental chemical changes occur that cause a reduction in seawater pH (or acidification) and reduces the availability of chemical compounds which play an important role in shell creation for a number of marine organisms. Ocean acidification impacts the ability of marine calcifiers, such as corals and mollusks, to make shells and skeletons from calcium carbonate. This is due to a reduction in the availability of the chemical constituents needed for calcified shells and plates. As a result, ocean acidification could affect some of the most fundamental biological and geochemical processes of the sea in coming decades and be disruptive to the marine food web. Estimates of economic losses from coral reef degradation in the Caribbean alone range from $350-870 million/year by 2015 to coastal countries which currently receive annual economic benefits from fisheries, dive tourism, and shoreline protection services valued collectively at $3-4 billion/year (Burke and Maidens, 2004).

Data collected from ocean sampling in the Pacific Ocean from the southern to northern hemispheres confirms that the oceans are becoming more acidic, according to NOAA’s Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory (PMEL). A recently completed field study from Tahiti to Alaska collecting data about the effects of ocean acidification on the water chemistry and marine organisms found evidence that verifies earlier computer model projections. These findings are consistent with data from previous field studies conducted in other oceans.

This blog post was republished at The Reef Tank

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

TEA PARTY SHENANIGANS: What ~2 million people really looks like

Thousands of protestors gathered over the weekend in Washington, D.C., to protest the Obama Administration’s agenda for the country. However, controversy over the number of protestors attending the rally ensued after several exaggerated estimates were perpetuated either negligently or purposefully by Michelle Malkin, Matt Kibbe of FreedomWorks, and careless Twitters.

The promoters of disinformation claimed the number of protestors in Washington D.C., were at 1 million to 1.5 million people, though other outrageous estimates were also declared. According to the D.C. Fire & EMS Department, ”unofficial crowds [numbered] 60,000-75,000.” To further delegitimize their cause, “tea party protesters trying to tout the size of their march on Washington last weekend . . . pass[ed] around a photo of a packed National Mall. But the picture is years old.” More from the Los Angeles Times:

As our colleague in Washington, Joe Markman, writes today, several conservative groups behind the march say that as many as 2 million people turned out to protest everything from Obama’s proposed healthcare overhaul to the legitimacy of his election.

Others, however, say the crowd was much smaller. A spokesman for the District of Columbia Fire Department made an unofficial estimate of 60,000 to 70,000 people.

Arguments about crowd estimates are, as Markman writes, “as much a part of Washington as its granite monuments.”
This one took a rather scandalous turn, however, when a photo circulated among conservatives as proof of a larger crowd was revealed to be a fake.

As a comparison to the 9/12 tea party protests, President Barack Obama’s inauguration had some 1.8 million attendees. Here’s what almost 2 million people looks like:

Barack Obama InaugurationImage Credit: AP Photo/Susan Walsh. Via The Big Picture at Boston.com

Barack Obama InaugurationImage Credit: JEWEL SAMAD/AFP/Getty Images. Via The Big Picture at Boston.com

Barack Obama Inauguration2Image Credit: AP Photo/GeoEye Satellite Image. Via The Big Picture at Boston.com

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

PIC TO SHARE

Jon^2 on Flickr captured this fascinating shot of a Philippine Tarsier (Tarsius syrichta)—locally known as the Maumag. Tarsiers are unique primates endemic to Southeast Asia. Another interesting tarsier image can be found here.

Philippine Tarsier


Photo source for attribution. The author or licensor of this image does not endorse my work or me and their image is protected under an attribution license.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

PIC TO SHARE

fmc.nikon.d40 on Flickr captured this beautiful shot of a pair of common mergansers (or goosander if you’re in the United Kingdom) taking flight.

Mergus merganser


Photo source for attribution. The author or licensor of this image does not endorse my work or me and their image is protected under an attribution license.

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook