FISHERIES: NOAA to require weak hooks to reduce the bycatch of large bluefin tuna in the Gulf of Mexico

Images: The first image shows, via the United Nations’ Fisheries and Aquaculture Department, a tuna longline. A yellowfin tuna is caught on a weak hook in the second image. Larger species are excluded, because the hooks “straighten when a large fish, such as bluefin tuna, is hooked, releasing it but holding on to smaller fish.” The image is via Mike Carde. Via NOAA, some weak hooks, at various stages of bending, are shown in the third image. The fourth image, via izik on Flickr, illustrates some longline hooks from an Alaskan fishery.


In a fishery, which can mean many things, fishers target certain species for personal consumption or for market. However, sometimes, fishers catch other species in addition to the species that they’re targeting. These non-target species are known as bycatch, and even though bycatch might be illegal to keep, to consume, to target, or to market, bycatch may still be incidentally caught in some fisheries.

Therefore, if the fisher doesn’t have a permit to keep certain species or if the species is illegal to keep, it’s simply wastefully discarded overboard. Bycatch isn’t wasted, however, if a fisheries observer is onboard to scientifically sample the species or if the fishers keep the specimen to turnover to scientists for research. As a result, bycatch can yield valuable data about a species and its interaction with commercial fishing gear.

Nonetheless, bycatch is a serious problem in some fisheries — particularly in some commercial fisheries, where the ecological footprint can be significant. Bycatch might include other species of fish, undersized or juvenile target species, marine mammals, sea turtles, sea birds, or invertebrates. Fisheries with little or no bycatch and minimal impact to the environment are often called clean fisheries. For example, “environmental seafood guides produced by Audubon and the Monterey Bay Aquarium have cited the Albacore troll fishery as an example of a clean fishery with little bycatch or impact on the environment.”

Due to being incidentally caught, some species, in particular, are at risk. For example, populations of endangered species, valuable species, or species that are easily caught as bycatch in certain fisheries suffer from illegal fishing or from fisheries that are inefficient or dirty. However, fisheries research can result in improvements that mitigate or even eliminate bycatch of certain species (thus making the fishery cleaner), so cooperative research is important in ensuring continued seafood production and in making fisheries more sustainable.

Big, fat female fish, which have a higher fecundity, and therefore are important to sustaining certain fish stocks or populations, are vulnerable as bycatch in some fisheries. The loss of important breeding individuals is devastating to certain fish stocks or to certain populations of fish species. One such fishery, which is problematic for incidentally removing important breeding individuals, is the surface-longline fishery. However, conservationists, fishery managers, and scientists are working to improve the fishery by tweaking fishing gear or utilizing bycatch reduction devices. Starting May 5, 2011, for example, “NOAA’s Fisheries Service will require commercial fishermen who fish for yellowfin tuna, swordfish and other species with longlines in the Gulf of Mexico to use a new type of hook, called a weak hook, designed to reduce the incidental catch of Atlantic bluefin tuna.” More via NOAA:

Directed fishing for bluefin tuna in the Gulf has been prohibited since the early 1980s, however bluefin are caught incidentally by longline fishermen who target other species. The Gulf of Mexico is the only known spawning area for the western stock of Atlantic bluefin tuna, a historically overfished species. Many bluefin die from the stress endured in this incidental capture in warm water even if fishermen release them.

“NOAA worked with longline fishermen from the Gulf to test the weak hook carefully over the last three years,” said Eric Schwaab, assistant NOAA administrator for NOAA’s Fisheries Service. “Our cooperative scientific research with fishermen is showing that this new technology can protect bluefin tuna in the Gulf while still allowing fishermen to target yellowfin tuna and swordfish.”

The weak hook is a circular hook constructed of thin gauge wire, and is designed to straighten when a large fish, such as bluefin tuna, is hooked, releasing it but holding on to smaller fish. The average size of bluefin tuna landed in the Gulf of Mexico longline fishery is 485 pounds, while the average for yellowfin tuna is about 86 pounds.

Yellowfin tuna and swordfish are valuable commercial fisheries in the Gulf of Mexico, supporting fishing jobs on approximately 50 vessels as well as jobs on shore. The two species bring longline fishermen annual dockside earnings of $7 million. Research showed that the weak hook could result in some reductions in target catch while some longline fishermen have reported weak hooks did not hurt their businesses.

“During our tests, we used regular hooks for half our hooks and half were the new weak hooks,” said Capt. Mike Carden, a longline fisherman from Panama City, Fla. who took part in the cooperative research. “We were so happy with the weak hooks we quit using the heavy hooks. The weak hook releases fish we don’t want to catch. Because it’s smaller and lighter, we catch more yellowfin tuna on the weak hook. There’s several of us who have gone to the weak hook.”

And from Dot Earth:

Federal fisheries officials, after field studies and public debate, have issued a new rule requiring commercial fishing boats deploying long lines of fish hooks in the Gulf of Mexico to use “weak hooks” that hold smaller, abundant species like yellowfin tuna but, in theory, will allow  depleted Atlantic bluefin tuna and other rare large species to escape. Here’s background in a news release from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

.       .       .

The agency release included a supporting comment from a captain of one of the 50 or so commercial longline vessels in the fishery:

“During our tests, we used regular hooks for half our hooks and half were the new weak hooks,” said Capt. Mike Carden, a longline fisherman from Panama City, Fla., who took part in the cooperative research. “We were so happy with the weak hooks we quit using the heavy hooks. The weak hook releases fish we don’t want to catch. Because it’s smaller and lighter, we catch more yellowfin tuna on the weak hook. There’s several of us who have gone to the weak hook.”

The Pew Environmental Trusts, which has been tracking the issue closely, gave a very mixed review to the move. Here’s a statement e-mailed to me by Dave Bard, a spokesman, followed by a video the group has produced on bluefin and the gulf:

Pew is pleased that the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) has recognized the major bycatch problem with bluefin tuna in the Gulf of Mexico, the fish’s only known spawning area in the western Atlantic Ocean. The agency has issued a short-term solution requiring the use of “weak” hooks starting May 5, 2011. Pew is also pleased that NMFS has left the door open to consider long-term solutions including time and area closures. But, a year-round prohibition on surface longlines is the only way to provide effective long-term protection for bluefin tuna and other rare and beautiful species in the Gulf. This prohibition would still allow fishermen in the Gulf to catch swordfish and yellowfin tuna; they would just be required to use more selective alternatives to wasteful surface longlines.

Here’s the video report:

You can continue reading more about this story at Dot Earth.

Online Resources:

  1. New Fishing Hooks Protect Bluefin Tuna in Gulf of Mexico But Allow Catch of Yellowfin Tuna and Swordfish
  2. Longline Gear Innovation
  3. Industrial Tuna Longlining
  4. WWF’s International Smart Gear Competition
  5. Stop Surface Longlining in the Gulf of Mexico
  6. Northeast Cooperative Fisheries Research
  7. Seafood Watch Program: A Consumer’s Guide to Sustainable Seafood

ENDANGERED SPECIES: Judge orders Fish and Wildlife Service to prepare recovery plan for jaguar

jaguarFrom E&ENews PM:

Judge John Roll of the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona ruled the agency erred in not preparing a recovery plan or designating critical habitat for the rare cat. His ruling orders federal officials to issue a new recovery plan and critical habitat decisions by January 2010.

The service listed the jaguar under the Endangered Species Act in 1997 but did not protect habitat for the cat or write a recovery plan — both required by law.

Initially, FWS officials said that since human takes of the jaguars were one of the chief threats, a habitat map could do more harm than good for the animal. The agency eventually dropped that argument after other jaguar recovery programs in the Southwest published maps. Agency officials then argued that the recovery efforts were not needed because the jaguar’s range in the United States was “insignificant.”

Roll ruled that the FWS findings were inconsistent with federal law and the best available science.

“Based upon a comprehensive review of the administrative record … and because the FWS determination does not appear to be based upon the best scientific evidence available, and because it is inconsistent with the statutory mandate of the ESA, its own regulations, and relevant case law, it must be set aside,” Roll wrote in his 33-page opinion.

Image Found Here

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook

CRITICALLY ENGANGERED SPECIES: Expedition fails to find evidence of new populations of once thought extinct duck from Madagascar

madagascar-pochard

In 2006, biologists for The Peregrine Fund discovered a remote and tiny population of Madagascar Pochards (Aythya innotata) made up of males, females, and most encouragingly—ducklings.

Madagascar pochards are a medium-sized diving duck endemic to Madagascar. Formally, the stronghold of this diving duck was Lake Alaotra, but the lake has over the years degraded due to agriculture production and pollution, the introduction of invasive species such as Tilapia sp. and water hyacinth, in addition to run off from anthropogenically-induced erosion via deforestation and soil degradation.

The duck was considered “possibly extinct” just before being rediscovered, but the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species currently lists the Madagascar pochard as critically endangered.

In order to save this species of duck from extinction, critical habitat must be designated where remnant populations exist, and establishing the species in captivity will further insure the survival of the species. From my experience, most species of pochard are relatively easy to keep, breed, and rear in captivity.

A recent expedition to Madagascar has failed to find new populations of Madagascar pochards in other areas. From the Durrell Wildlife Conservation Trust:

Dr Glyn Young recently participated in an expedition into Madagascar aimed at finding further populations of the Madagascar pochard – a medium-sized diving duck. The duck had been considered extinct by many authorities for more than ten years, until last winter’s sighting of nine adults and four juveniles….

According to Dr Young the ducks were found in a slightly different habitat and in a different location to what had been expected, sparking new hopes that there might be similar, undiscovered populations in Madagascar.

He said: “The Madagascar pochard is extremely secretive and little is known about its life-cycle and behaviour. It was believed that they preferred marshy lakes with lots of reeds and emergent vegetation but the newly discovered population was found in a steep sided volcanic lake with little shoreline marsh and reeds.”

This year’s expedition was aimed at locating further populations of the bird, but sadly four weeks of surveying Madagascar’s remote hill-sides yielded no further sightings.

Dr Young added: “The failure to find any other populations of the duck highlights the need for immediate conservation intervention to save this species. The Durrell team will be working closely with other conservation organisations over the coming weeks to develop a strategy that will stop this species disappearing off the face of the earth.”

Image Found Here
Image Found Here
Image Found Here
Image Found Here

add to del.icio.us :: Add to Blinkslist :: add to furl :: Digg it :: add to ma.gnolia :: Stumble It! :: add to simpy :: seed the vine :: :: :: TailRank :: post to facebook